LEADER 04114nam  22007815  450 
001 9910733714903321
005 20200630072715.0
010   $a1-137-53157-6
024 7 $a10.1057/9781137531575
035   $a(CKB)3710000000636065
035   $a(SSID)ssj0001647987
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)16416636
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001647987
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)14794989
035   $a(PQKB)10603880
035   $a(DE-He213)978-1-137-53157-5
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4716686
035   $a(EXLCZ)993710000000636065
100   $a20160217d2016      u|             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurnn|008mamaa
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aRegime Transition and the Judicial Politics of Enmity$b[electronic resource] $eDemocratic Inclusion and Exclusion in South Korean Constitutional Justice /$fby Justine Guichard
205   $a1st ed. 2016.
210  1$aNew York :$cPalgrave Macmillan US :$cImprint: Palgrave Macmillan,$d2016.
215   $a1 online resource (XVIII, 248 p.) 
225 1 $aThe Sciences Po Series in International Relations and Political Economy
300   $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph
311   $a1-349-72045-3 
311   $a1-137-57507-7 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
330   $aAmong the societies that experienced a political transition away from authoritarianism in the 1980s, South Korea is known as a paragon of 'successful democratization.' This achievement is considered to be intimately tied to a new institution introduced with the 1987 change of regime, intended to safeguard fundamental norms and rights: the Constitutional Court of Korea. While constitutional justice is largely celebrated for having achieved both purposes, this book proposes an innovative and critical account of the court's role. Relying on an interpretive analysis of jurisprudence, it uncovers the ambivalence with which the court has intervened in the major dispute opposing the state and parts of civil society after the transition: (re)defining enmity. In response to this challenge, constitutional justice has produced both liberal and illiberal outcomes, promoting the rule of law and basic rights while reinforcing the mechanisms of exclusion bounding South Korean democracy in the name of national security.
410  0$aThe Sciences Po Series in International Relations and Political Economy
606   $aPolitical science
606   $aLaw?Philosophy
606   $aLaw
606   $aAsia?Politics and government
606   $aWorld politics
606   $aDemocracy
606   $aConstitutional law
606   $aPolitical Science$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/911000
606   $aTheories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/R11011
606   $aAsian Politics$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/911110
606   $aPolitical History$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/911080
606   $aDemocracy$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/911050
606   $aConstitutional Law$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/R17028
607   $aKorea (South)$xHistory
615  0$aPolitical science.
615  0$aLaw?Philosophy.
615  0$aLaw.
615  0$aAsia?Politics and government.
615  0$aWorld politics.
615  0$aDemocracy.
615  0$aConstitutional law.
615 14$aPolitical Science.
615 24$aTheories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History.
615 24$aAsian Politics.
615 24$aPolitical History.
615 24$aDemocracy.
615 24$aConstitutional Law.
676   $a347.5195/035
700   $aGuichard$b Justine$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$0787618
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910733714903321
996   $aRegime Transition and the Judicial Politics of Enmity$93397909
997   $aUNINA