LEADER 03988oam 2200577 450 001 9910717454003321 005 20220627083051.0 024 7 $a10.7249/RR-A1013-1 035 $a(CKB)5340000000070062 035 $a(OCoLC)1289319981 035 $a(EXLCZ)995340000000070062 100 $a20211217h20212021 ua 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aOrganizational characteristics associated with risk of sexual assault and sexual harassment in the U.S. Army /$fMiriam Matthews [and five others] 210 1$aSanta Monica, Calif. :$cRAND Corporation,$d2021. 215 $a1 online resource (xvii, 89 pages) $cillustrations 225 1 $aResearch report ;$vRR-A1013-1 300 $a"Prepared for the United States Army." 311 $a1-9774-0688-2 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 327 $aIntroduction -- Approach to Estimating Sexual Assault Risk and Sexual Harassment Risk in the Army -- Sexual Assault Risk Results -- Sexual Harassment Risk Results -- Discussion and Recommendations -- Appendix A: Technical Modeling Details -- Appendix B: Adjusted Installation Sexual Assault Risk from 2014 to 2018 -- Appendix C: All Risk Estimates for All Clusters -- Appendix D: Classification of Career Management Fields. 330 $aExtending previous RAND analyses, researchers found variation in total sexual assault risk?estimated prevalence of sexual assault?across groups of soldiers. For example, Army women at Fort Hood, Fort Bliss, and several other bases face total sexual assault risk that is higher than the risk faced by the average woman in the Army. Sexual harassment is more common than sexual assault, but the results also showed that risk of sexual harassment is highly associated with risk of sexual assault. Thus, bases with high sexual assault risk also have high sexual harassment risk. One question is whether groups with higher risk estimates simply have soldiers assigned to them who are at higher risk because of their individual characteristics (e.g., younger, unmarried), or whether personnel in those groups would experience lower risk if stationed elsewhere. To evaluate this, researchers calculated adjusted risk: This measures how much higher or lower than expected the risk of sexual assault is for a group of soldiers. Army women at Fort Hood had an adjusted sexual assault risk of 1.7 percent during 2018, indicating that their risk was 1.7 percent higher than expected based on the characteristics of women assigned there.  Several characteristics were associated with different levels of adjusted risk for Army women's sexual assault and sexual harassment and for men's sexual harassment, including positive unit or supervisor climate (associated with lower risk) and deployment operational tempo (associated with higher risk). Army women in environments with higher proportions of combat arms have higher adjusted risk. 606 $aRape in the military$zUnited States 606 $aSexual harassment in the military$zUnited States 606 $aRape in the military$2fast 606 $aSexual harassment in the military$2fast 607 $aUnited States$2fast 615 0$aRape in the military 615 0$aSexual harassment in the military 615 7$aRape in the military. 615 7$aSexual harassment in the military. 676 $a362.883088/35500973 700 $aMatthews$b Miriam$c(Behavioral scientist),$01253839 712 02$aRand Corporation, 712 02$aUnited States.$bDepartment of the Army, 801 0$bAD# 801 1$bAD# 801 2$bAD# 801 2$bOCLCF 801 2$bGPO 801 2$bOCLCO 801 2$bOCLCQ 801 2$bGPO 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910717454003321 996 $aOrganizational characteristics associated with risk of sexual assault and sexual harassment in the U.S. Army$93401924 997 $aUNINA