LEADER 02349oam 22004934a 450 001 9910481022703321 005 20190827040227.0 010 $a1-5261-1084-9 010 $a1-5261-1085-7 035 $a(CKB)3710000001018514 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4777265 035 $a(OCoLC)981555334 035 $a(MdBmJHUP)muse59428 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000001018514 100 $a20150421d2014 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $2rdacontent 182 $2rdamedia 183 $2rdacarrier 200 10$aDavid Lean$fMelanie Williams 210 1$aNew York :$cManchester University Press,$d2014. 210 3$aBaltimore, Md. :$cProject MUSE, $d2017 210 4$dİ2014. 215 $a1 online resource (282 pages) $cillustrations 225 0 $aBritish film makers 311 $a1-5261-1681-2 311 $a0-7190-7385-5 320 $aIncludes filmography: pages 246-252. 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 253-261) and index. 327 $aCutting and Coward : David Lean's early career and In which we serve (1942), This happy breed (1944) and Blithe spirit (1945) -- Nineteenth-century blues : Great expectations (1946), Oliver Twist (1948), Madeleine (1950) and Hobson's choice (1954) -- Women in love: Brief encounter (1945), The passionate friends (1949), and Summer madness (1955) -- Men of vision : The sound barrier (1952), The bridge on the River Kwai (1957) and Lawrence of Arabia (1962) -- Feminising the epic : Doctor Zhivago (1965), Ryan's daughter (1970) and A passage to India (1984) -- Filmography as director. 330 $aA comprehensive overview of the director's work, including both established classics and lesser-known works, that combines archival investigation of production details, marketing, and critical reception as well as close readings in terms of mise en scene, cinematography, editing, and soundtrack. 410 0$aBritish film makers. 607 $aVerenigd Koninkrijk van Groot-Brittannie? en Noord-Ierland$2gtt 608 $aCriticism, interpretation, etc. 608 $aElectronic books. 676 $a791.4302/33092 700 $aWilliams$b Melanie$f1974-$0889390 801 0$bMdBmJHUP 801 1$bMdBmJHUP 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910481022703321 996 $aDavid Lean$92446605 997 $aUNINA LEADER 04262nam 2200517 450 001 9910717369303321 005 20221025061909.0 035 $a(CKB)3710000000362748 035 $a(NjHacI)993710000000362748 035 $a(OCoLC)902835074$z(OCoLC)1117801167 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000362748 100 $a20221025d2013 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aIntimate partner violence $eprevalence among U.S. military veterans and active duty servicemembers and a review of intervention approaches /$fJennifer M Gierisch [and five others] 210 1$aWashington, District of Columbia :$cDepartment of Veterans Affairs (US),$d[2013] 210 4$dİ2013 215 $a1 online resource (iii, 79 pages) $cillustrations (some color) 225 1 $aEvidence-based synthesis program 300 $a"Evidence-based synthesis program." 300 $a"August 2013." 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 330 3 $aIn the United States, intimate partner violence (IPV) poses a significant public health burden that affects both men and women. Over a third (35.6%) of women and a fourth (28.5%) of men in the United States have experienced rape, physical violence, or stalking by an intimate partner in their lifetime. Outcomes associated with IPV include a wide range of social, physical, and mental issues such as family dissolution, adverse pregnancy outcomes, mental health issues (depression, posttraumatic stress disorder [PTSD], anxiety), incarceration, and death. IPV affects many facets of society including medical, mental health, social services, and criminal justice systems.^Moreover, productivity losses and costs attributable to IPV are significant.^Military service has unique psychological, social, and environmental factors that may contribute to elevated risk of IPV among active duty servicemembers and Veterans.^Multiple deployments, family separation and reintegration, demanding workloads at home and while on duty, histories of head trauma, mental illness, and substance abuse can contribute to partner conflict and elevated risk of IPV among active duty servicemembers, Veterans, and their intimate partners. Currently the VA does not have a comprehensive national program to address IPV.^Thus, the VA convened the Domestic Violence Task Force to define the scope of, and design a plan for evaluating domestic violence among Veterans.^In order to support the goals and mission of this task force, the Durham VA Evidence-based Synthesis Program conducted a systemic review of the literature to synthesize the evidence on the prevalence of IPV among active duty servicemembers and Veterans and to conduct an evidence synthesis of the systematic review (SR) literature on intervention strategies to address IPV. Key Question 1.^What is the prevalence of intimate partner violence among Veterans and active duty servicemembers, and does the prevalence vary by cohort (e.g., Vietnam era, OEF/OIF/OND era), gender, or race? Key Question 2. For persons who are at risk for, experience, or commit intimate partner violence, what interventions are associated with decreased exposure to intimate partner violence and its associated physical harms, mental harms, or mortality? 410 0$aEvidence-based synthesis program (Series) 517 $aIntimate partner violence 606 $aMarital violence$zUnited States$xPrevention 606 $aVeterans$zUnited States$xPsychology 607 $aUnited States$2fast 608 $aTechnical reports.$2lcgft 615 0$aMarital violence$xPrevention. 615 0$aVeterans$xPsychology. 676 $a364.15553 700 $aGierisch$b Jennifer M.$01353451 712 02$aQuality Enhancement Research Initiative (U.S.) 712 02$aUnited States.$bDepartment of Veterans Affairs.$bHealth Services Research and Development Service, 712 02$aDurham VA Medical Center.$bEvidence-based Synthesis Program Center. 712 02$aEvidence-based Synthesis Program (U.S.) 801 0$bNjHacI 801 1$bNjHacl 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910717369303321 996 $aIntimate partner violence$93254398 997 $aUNINA