LEADER 01826nam 2200409 450 001 9910717291903321 005 20220301102905.0 035 $a(CKB)5470000002529303 035 $a(OCoLC)1300759644 035 $a(EXLCZ)995470000002529303 100 $a20220301d2021 ua 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aCultural exchanges, property, and cooperation $eimport restrictions : memorandum of understanding between the United States of America Greece, signed at Athens, September 22, 2021 ; entered into force November 19, 2021, with effect from November 21, 2021 210 1$a[Washington, D.C.] :$cUnited States Department of State,$d[2021?] 215 $a1 online resource (9 unnumbered pages) 225 1 $aTreaties and other international acts series ;$v21-1119 517 3 $aMemorandum of understanding between the United States of America and Greece, signed at Athens, September 22, 2021 ; entered into force November 19, 2021, with effect from November 21, 2021 606 $aCultural property$xProtection$xLaw and legislation$zGreece 606 $aCultural property$xProtection$xLaw and legislation$zUnited States 606 $aHistoric preservation$xInternational cooperation 608 $aTreaties.$2lcgft 615 0$aCultural property$xProtection$xLaw and legislation 615 0$aCultural property$xProtection$xLaw and legislation 615 0$aHistoric preservation$xInternational cooperation. 712 02$aUnited States.$bDepartment of State, 712 02$aGreece, 712 02$aUnited States, 801 0$bGPO 801 1$bGPO 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910717291903321 996 $aCultural exchanges, property, and cooperation$93444434 997 $aUNINA LEADER 04240nam 22006135 450 001 9910554215403321 005 20200526040355.0 010 $a9781501747724 010 $a150174772X 024 7 $a10.7591/9781501747731 035 $a(CKB)4100000010650436 035 $a(OCoLC)1104853384 035 $a(MdBmJHUP)muse81257 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5964931 035 $a(DE-B1597)533950 035 $a(DE-B1597)9781501747731 035 $a(Perlego)969035 035 $a(EXLCZ)994100000010650436 100 $a20200526h20202020 fg 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|||||||nn|n 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aReputation for Resolve $eHow Leaders Signal Determination in International Politics /$fDanielle L. Lupton 210 1$aIthaca, NY : $cCornell University Press, $d[2020] 210 4$dİ2020 215 $a1 online resource (1 online resource) 225 0 $aCornell Studies in Security Affairs 311 08$a9781501747717 311 08$a1501747711 311 08$a9781501747731 311 08$a1501747738 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $tFrontmatter -- $tContents -- $tList of Illustrations -- $tAcknowledgments -- $tIntroduction: Why Leaders and Their Reputations for Resolve Matter -- $t1. How Leaders Establish Reputations for Resolve -- $t2. How Leader-Specific Reputations Form and Change across Repeated Interactions -- $t3. How Contextual Factors Influence Leader-Specific Reputations -- $t4. A Reputation for Resolute Action: Eisenhower and Berlin -- $t5. A Reputation for Irresolute Action: Kennedy, Berlin, and Cuba -- $tConclusion: Lessons in Leader-Specific Reputations for Resolve -- $tAppendix A: Methods -- $tAppendix B: Results -- $tNotes -- $tBibliography -- $tIndex 330 $aHow do reputations form in international politics? What influence do these reputations have on the conduct of international affairs? In Reputation for Resolve, Danielle L. Lupton takes a new approach to answering these enduring and hotly debated questions by shifting the focus away from the reputations of countries and instead examining the reputations of individual leaders.Lupton argues that new leaders establish personal reputations for resolve that are separate from the reputations of their predecessors and from the reputations of their states. Using innovative survey experiments and in-depth archival research, she finds that leaders acquire personal reputations for resolve based on their foreign policy statements and behavior. Reputation for Resolve shows that statements create expectations of how leaders will react to foreign policy crises in the future and that leaders who fail to meet expectations of resolute action face harsh reputational consequences.Reputation for Resolve challenges the view that reputations do not matter in international politics. In sharp contrast, Lupton shows that the reputations for resolve of individual leaders influence the strategies statesmen pursue during diplomatic interactions and crises, and she delineates specific steps policymakers can take to avoid developing reputations for irresolute action. Lupton demonstrates that reputations for resolve do exist and can influence the conduct of international security. Thus, Reputation for Resolve reframes our understanding of the influence of leaders and their rhetoric on crisis bargaining and the role reputations play in international politics. 410 0$aCornell studies in security affairs. 606 $aDetermination (Personality trait)$xPolitical aspects 606 $aReputation$xPolitical aspects 606 $aPolitical leadership 606 $aWorld politics$y1955-1965 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aDetermination (Personality trait)$xPolitical aspects. 615 0$aReputation$xPolitical aspects. 615 0$aPolitical leadership. 615 0$aWorld politics 676 $a327.1 700 $aLupton$b Danielle L., $4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$01218567 801 0$bDE-B1597 801 1$bDE-B1597 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910554215403321 996 $aReputation for Resolve$92817947 997 $aUNINA