LEADER 02388oam 2200505 450 001 9910717236603321 005 20201215171631.0 035 $a(CKB)25435000300041 035 $a(OCoLC)1125006866 035 $a(EXLCZ)9925435000300041 100 $a20191025h20192019 ua 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcn||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aNegotiations, continued $eensuring the positive performance of power-sharing arrangements /$fby David Lanz, Laurie Nathan, and Alexandre Raffoul 210 1$aWashington, DC :$cUnited States Institute of Peace,$d2019. 210 4$dİ2019 215 $a1 online resource (15 pages) $ccolor illustrations 225 1 $aSpecial report ;$v455 300 $a"September 2019." 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 14). 327 $aIntroduction -- Power sharing in practice -- How to overcome the power sharing dilemma? -- Evidence from Northern Ireland, Nepal, Burundi, and Bosnia -- Findings and recommendations -- Applications to current negotiations. 330 $a"Most negotiated peace settlements since the 1990s have featured some aspect of power sharing, including those in Northern Ireland, Burundi, Bosnia, and Nepal. However, by freezing a sometimes unstable status quo, power sharing can create challenges to maintaining peace over the longer term as issues arise that rekindle enmity or create new suspicions among the parties. This report argues that power-sharing arrangements can be made more durable by providing robust forums, either permanent or ad hoc, that allow parties to resolve differences as they arise and to reaffirm their commitment to peace" -- Publisher's web site. 606 $aPeace-building 606 $aCoalition governments 606 $aCoalition governments$2fast 606 $aPeace-building$2fast 615 0$aPeace-building. 615 0$aCoalition governments. 615 7$aCoalition governments. 615 7$aPeace-building. 700 $aLanz$b David$01410515 702 $aNathan$b Laurie 702 $aRaffoul$b Alexandre 712 02$aUnited States Institute of Peace, 801 0$bAWC 801 1$bAWC 801 2$bOCLCF 801 2$bGPO 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910717236603321 996 $aNegotiations, continued$93499342 997 $aUNINA