LEADER 04237oam 2200805 450 001 9910715163403321 005 20220426080022.0 035 $a(CKB)5470000002508379 035 $a(OCoLC)1099620769$z(OCoLC)1117899727$z(OCoLC)1231437946 035 $a(EXLCZ)995470000002508379 100 $a20190314d2018 ua 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcn||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aEvidence brief$iUse of patient reported outcome measures for measurement based care in mental health shared decision-making /$finvestigators, Kim Peterson, Johanna Anderson, Donald Bourne 210 1$aWashington, DC :$cDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Quality Enhancement Research Initiative, Health Services Research & Development Service,$dNovember 2018. 215 $a1 online resource (3 volumes) $cillustrations (some color) 300 $a"November 2018." 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 327 $aBrief -- Executive summary -- Supplemental materials. 330 3 $aMeasurement based care (MBC) is a care delivery approach involving the regular use of standardized measures in routine mental health care to identify individuals not improving as expected and to prompt treatment changes. In the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), MBC is specifically defined as: (1) Collect = use of "reliable, validated, clinically appropriate measures at intake and at regular intervals", (2) Share = "results from the measures are immediately shared and discussed with the Veteran and other providers involved in the Veteran's Care", and (3) Act = "Together, providers and Veterans use outcome measures to develop treatment plans, assess progress over time, and inform shared decisions about changes to the treatment plan over time". As of January 2018, the Joint Commission requires MBC use in all mental health treatment programs accredited under behavioral health standards both within and outside of VA. As MBC delivery has varied widely and shown equally variable clinically meaningful effects across studies, guidance is needed on which specific delivery approaches may operate most effectively and why. This rapid evidence synthesis builds on recent conflicting reviews by adding 14 new studies and focusing on the subset of approaches with the most clinically meaningful and highest-strength evidence and with the most relevance to the specific approach currently recommended by VA. 517 3 $aUse of patient reported outcome measures for measurement based care in mental health shared decision-making 517 1 $aEvidence brief: use of PROMs for MBC in shared decision-making 606 $aMental illness 606 $aTherapeutics 606 $aDecision making 606 $aOutcome assessment (Medical care) 606 $aMental illness$xTreatment 606 $aDecision making$2fast 606 $aMental illness$2fast 606 $aOutcome assessment (Medical care)$2fast 606 $aTherapeutics$2fast 608 $aTables (Data)$2lcgft 615 0$aMental illness. 615 0$aTherapeutics. 615 0$aDecision making. 615 0$aOutcome assessment (Medical care) 615 0$aMental illness$xTreatment. 615 7$aDecision making. 615 7$aMental illness. 615 7$aOutcome assessment (Medical care) 615 7$aTherapeutics. 700 $aPeterson$b Kim$01385536 702 $aAnderson$b Johanna 702 $aBourne$b Donald 712 02$aQuality Enhancement Research Initiative (U.S.) 712 02$aUnited States.$bDepartment of Veterans Affairs.$bHealth Services Research and Development Service, 712 02$aVA Portland Health Care System.$bEvidence Synthesis Program. 801 0$bNLM 801 1$bNLM 801 2$bLVT 801 2$bVT2 801 2$bOCLCO 801 2$bNLM 801 2$bOCLCO 801 2$bOCLCA 801 2$bGPO 801 2$bOCLCO 801 2$bOCLCF 801 2$bOCLCO 801 2$bOCLCA 801 2$bOCLCQ 801 2$bOCLCO 801 2$bGPO 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910715163403321 996 $aEvidence brief$93470124 997 $aUNINA