LEADER 02945aam 2200481I 450 001 9910711180503321 005 20151105023937.0 024 8 $aGOVPUB-C13-b74b963d8667eb22c477f88bea32cc2f 035 $a(CKB)5470000002480203 035 $a(OCoLC)927737217 035 $a(EXLCZ)995470000002480203 100 $a20151105d1992 ua 0 101 0 $aeng 181 $2rdacontent 182 $2rdamedia 183 $2rdacarrier 200 10$aAutomated tools for testing computer system vulnerability /$fW. Timothy Polk 210 1$aGaithersburg, MD :$cU.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology,$d1992. 215 $a1 online resource 225 1 $aNIST special publication ;$v800-6 300 $a1992. 300 $aContributed record: Metadata reviewed, not verified. Some fields updated by batch processes. 300 $aTitle from PDF title page. 300 $aWithdrawn. 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 330 3 $aComputer security "incidents" occur with alarming frequency. The incidents range from direct attacks by both hackers and insiders to automated attacks such as network worms. Weak system controls are frequently cited as the cause, but many of these incidents are the result of improper use of existing control mechanisms. For example, improper access control specifications for key system files could open the entire system to unauthorized access. Moreover, many computer systems are delivered with default settings that, if left unchanged, leave the system exposed. This document discusses automated tools for testing computer system vulnerability. By analyzing factors affecting the security of a computer system, a system manager can identify common vulnerabilities stemming from administrative errors. Using automated tools, this process may examine the content and protections of hundreds of files on a multi-user system and identify subtle vulnerabilities. By acting on this information, system administrators can significantly reduce their systems' security exposure. This document examines basic requirements for vulnerability testing tools and describes the different functional classes of tools. Finally, the document offers general recommendations about the selection and distribution of such tools. 610 $aChange detection 610 $aComputer security 610 $aConfiguration review 610 $aIdentification of vulnerabilities 610 $aSecure audit 610 $aTrojan horse detection 610 $aVulnerability testing 700 $aPolk$b W. Timothy$01410280 701 $aPolk$b W. Timothy$01410280 712 02$aNational Institute of Standards and Technology (U.S.).$bComputer Security Division. 801 0$bNBS 801 1$bNBS 801 2$bGPO 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910711180503321 996 $aAutomated tools for testing computer system vulnerability$93530283 997 $aUNINA LEADER 02965oam 2200661 450 001 9910713578403321 005 20200514082400.0 035 $a(CKB)5470000002501877 035 $a(OCoLC)966434773 035 $a(OCoLC)995470000002501877 035 $a(EXLCZ)995470000002501877 100 $a20161219d1989 ua 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurbn||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aEffects of limestone quarrying and cement-plant operations on runoff and sediment yields in the upper Permanente Creek Basin, Santa Clara County, California /$fby K. Michael Nolan and Barry R. Hill 210 1$aSacramento, California :$cU.S. Geological Survey,$d1989. 215 $a1 online resource (vi, 48 pages) $cillustrations, maps 225 1 $aWater-resources investigations report ;$v89-4130 300 $a"Prepared in cooperation with the Santa Clara Valley Water District." 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 46-48). 517 3 $aRunoff and sediment yields, upper Permanente Creek Basin, California 606 $aQuarries and quarrying$xEnvironmental aspects$zCalifornia$zSanta Clara County 606 $aCement plants$xEnvironmental aspects$zCalifornia$zSanta Clara County 606 $aLimestone$xEnvironmental aspects$zCalifornia$zSanta Clara County 606 $aRunoff$zCalifornia$zSanta Clara County$xMathematical models 606 $aSediment transport$zCalifornia$zSanta Clara County$xMathematical models 606 $aCement plants$xEnvironmental aspects$2fast 606 $aLimestone$xEnvironmental aspects$2fast 606 $aQuarries and quarrying$xEnvironmental aspects$2fast 606 $aRunoff$xMathematical models$2fast 606 $aSediment transport$xMathematical models$2fast 607 $aCalifornia$zSanta Clara County$2fast 615 0$aQuarries and quarrying$xEnvironmental aspects 615 0$aCement plants$xEnvironmental aspects 615 0$aLimestone$xEnvironmental aspects 615 0$aRunoff$xMathematical models. 615 0$aSediment transport$xMathematical models. 615 7$aCement plants$xEnvironmental aspects. 615 7$aLimestone$xEnvironmental aspects. 615 7$aQuarries and quarrying$xEnvironmental aspects. 615 7$aRunoff$xMathematical models. 615 7$aSediment transport$xMathematical models. 700 $aNolan$b K. Michael$g(Kenneth Michael),$f1949-$01383503 702 $aHill$b Barry R. 712 02$aGeological Survey (U.S.), 712 02$aSanta Clara Valley Water District (Calif.) 801 0$bCOP 801 1$bCOP 801 2$bOCLCO 801 2$bOCLCF 801 2$bGPO 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910713578403321 996 $aEffects of limestone quarrying and cement-plant operations on runoff and sediment yields in the upper Permanente Creek Basin, Santa Clara County, California$93523628 997 $aUNINA