LEADER 02409oam 2200625I 450 001 9910457078603321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a1-134-90675-7 010 $a1-280-14504-8 010 $a0-203-99266-0 024 7 $a10.4324/9780203992661 035 $a(CKB)1000000000361170 035 $a(EBL)242204 035 $a(OCoLC)275198781 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000250868 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11191507 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000250868 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10245054 035 $a(PQKB)10889793 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC242204 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL242204 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10165491 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL14504 035 $a(OCoLC)252979883 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000361170 100 $a20180331d1993 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 04$aThe state of theory /$fedited by Richard Bradford 210 1$aLondon ;$aNew York :$cRoutledge,$d1993. 215 $a1 online resource (151 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a0-415-07324-3 311 $a0-415-07323-5 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aBOOK COVER; HALF-TITLE; TITLE; COPYRIGHT; CONTENTS; CONTRIBUTORS; PREFACE; 1 CYBERTHEORY; 2 THEORY AND DIFFICULTY; 3 IN EXEMPLIFICATION; 4 LEAVING PARTIES AND LEGACIES; 5 TOWARDS A GOTHIC CRITICISM; 6 PARADIGM LOST AND PARADIGM REGAINED; 7 THE TERGIVERSATIONS OF EMINENT FEMINISTS; 8 HAVING YOUR ASSUMPTIONS QUESTIONED; 9 AESTHETICS, CULTURAL STUDIES AND THE TEACHING OF ENGLISH; 10 TEACHING THEORY; INDEX 330 $aWritten by teachers who are also at the forefront of the development of critical theory, The State of Theory offers a diversity of perspectives, both practical and theoretical, on the current state of literary studies in education. 606 $aCriticism 606 $aLiterature$xStudy and teaching (Higher)$zGreat Britain 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aCriticism. 615 0$aLiterature$xStudy and teaching (Higher) 676 $a801.95 676 $a801/.95 701 $aBradford$b Richard$f1957-$0740031 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910457078603321 996 $aThe state of theory$92029783 997 $aUNINA LEADER 02838oam 2200421 450 001 9910708612303321 005 20170421162808.0 035 $a(CKB)5470000002471107 035 $a(OCoLC)928634510 035 $a(EXLCZ)995470000002471107 100 $a20151110d2015 ua 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurmn||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aMilitary personnel, DOD should develop a plan to evaluate the effectiveness of its Career Intermission Pilot program : report to congressional committees 210 1$a[Washington, D.C.] :$cUnited States Government Accountability Office,$d2015. 215 $a1 online resource (iii, 25 pages) $ccolor illustrations 300 $a"October 2015." 300 $a"Accessible version." 300 $a"GAO-16-35." 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 330 $aCongress authorized CIPP in 2009 to provide greater flexibility in career paths for servicemembers and to enhance retention. CIPP allows servicemembers to take sabbaticals of up to 3 years in exchange for 2 months of obligated service for each month of sabbatical taken. The Navy is the only service to have participants who have completed sabbaticals. This report (1) evaluates the extent to which participation in CIPP has reached authorized participation limits and DOD has developed a plan for evaluating whether the program is an effective means to retain servicemembers; and (2) describes the Navy's reported experience with CIPP as a tool for aiding retention by providing career flexibility. GAO reviewed CIPP legislation and implementation guidance, interviewed DOD and service officials responsible for CIPP, and compared the information obtained against key features of pilot evaluation plans such as clear, measurable objectives and standards for determining pilot-program performance. GAO also reviewed Navy efforts to implement CIPP and, using a GAO-developed questionnaire, collected information from Navy CIPP participants who had completed their sabbaticals. GAO recommends that DOD develop and implement a plan to evaluate whether CIPP is enhancing retention. 517 $aMilitary personnel, DOD should develop a plan to evaluate the effectiveness of its Career Intermission Pilot program 606 $aEmployee retention$zUnited States 606 $aSabbatical leave 615 0$aEmployee retention 615 0$aSabbatical leave. 701 $aFarrell$b Brenda S$01383624 801 0$bDID 801 1$bDID 801 2$bOCLCQ 801 2$bGPO 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910708612303321 996 $aMilitary personnel, DOD should develop a plan to evaluate the effectiveness of its Career Intermission Pilot program : report to congressional committees$93465108 997 $aUNINA LEADER 01645nas 2200457- 450 001 9910873653103321 005 20210125095815.0 035 $a(OCoLC)896235621 035 $a(CKB)3710000000536791 035 $a(CONSER)--2015204067 035 $a(IEEE)1803431 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000536791 100 $a20141120a20139999 s-- a 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$a... International Symposium on Computing and Networking 210 1$aPiscataway, NJ :$cIEEE,$d[2013]- 300 $aProceedings of symposium and workshops held in conjunction with it. 311 $a2379-1888 606 $aElectronic data processing$xDistributed processing$vCongresses 606 $aComputer networks$vCongresses 606 $aComputer systems$vCongresses 606 $aComputer networks$2fast$3(OCoLC)fst00872297 606 $aComputer systems$2fast$3(OCoLC)fst00872651 606 $aElectronic data processing$xDistributed processing$2fast$3(OCoLC)fst00906987 608 $aConference papers and proceedings.$2fast 615 0$aElectronic data processing$xDistributed processing 615 0$aComputer networks 615 0$aComputer systems 615 7$aComputer networks. 615 7$aComputer systems. 615 7$aElectronic data processing$xDistributed processing. 676 $a004 712 02$aInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 906 $aCONFERENCE 912 $a9910873653103321 996 $a.. International Symposium on Computing and Networking$92498284 997 $aUNINA