LEADER 02266oam  2200505I  450 
001 9910707500803321
005 20160808121627.0
035   $a(CKB)5470000002464515
035   $a(OCoLC)956318088
035   $a(EXLCZ)995470000002464515
100   $a20160808j201606    ua             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|||||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 14$aThe U.S. HRA empirical study $eassessment of HRA method predictions against operating crew performance on a U.S. nuclear power plant simulator /$fprepared by John Forester [and eleven others] ; Sandia National Laboratories [and six others]
210  1$aWashington, DC :$cU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research,$dJune 2016.
215   $a1 online resource (various pagings) $cillustrations
300   $aTitle from title screen (viewed on July 26, 2016).
300   $a"NUREG-2156."
300   $a"Manuscript completed: September 2015; date published: June 2016."
300   $a"Erasmia Lois and Y. James Chang, NRC project managers."
300   $a"Performing organization: Sandia National Laboratories"--Bibliographic data sheet.
300   $a"Sponsoring organization: Division fo Risk Analysis, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission"--Bibliographic data sheet.
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references.
517   $aU.S. HRA empirical study 
606   $aNuclear power plants$xHuman factors$zUnited States
606   $aHuman-machine systems$zUnited States
606   $aNuclear power plants$zUnited States$xReliability
606   $aNuclear power plants$zUnited States$xComputer simulation
615  0$aNuclear power plants$xHuman factors
615  0$aHuman-machine systems
615  0$aNuclear power plants$xReliability.
615  0$aNuclear power plants$xComputer simulation.
700   $aForester$b John$035599
712 02$aU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.$bDivision of Risk Analysis,
712 02$aSandia National Laboratories,
801  0$bGPO
801  1$bGPO
801  2$bGPO
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910707500803321
996   $aThe U.S. HRA empirical study$93501627
997   $aUNINA