LEADER 00809nam0-2200289---450- 001 990008254490403321 005 20060112120718.0 035 $a000825449 035 $aFED01000825449 035 $a(Aleph)000825449FED01 035 $a000825449 100 $a20060112d1974----km-y0itay50------ba 101 0 $aeng 102 $aGB 105 $ay-------001yy 200 1 $aTeacher training in Britain$fprepared for British Information Services ... 210 $aLondon$cs.n.$d1974 215 $a36 p.$d24 cm 610 0 $aGran Bretagna 710 02$aBritish Information Services$0290461 801 0$aIT$bUNINA$gRICA$2UNIMARC 901 $aBK 912 $a990008254490403321 952 $aFF Per.049(74,2)$bIst. s.i.$fILFGE 959 $aILFGE 996 $aTeacher training in Britain$9743226 997 $aUNINA LEADER 01475nam 2200385 450 001 9910705492903321 005 20140523122406.0 035 $a(CKB)5470000002450454 035 $a(OCoLC)880427018 035 $a(EXLCZ)995470000002450454 100 $a20140523d1979 ua 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurbn||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aUsing an assessment center to predict field leadership performance of Army officers and NCOs /$fFrederick N. Dyer and Richard E. Hilligoss 210 1$aAlexandria, Virginia :$cU.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences,$d1979. 215 $a1 online resource (vi unnumbered pages, 30 pages) 225 1 $aTechnical paper ;$v372 300 $a"ARI Field Unit at Fort Benning, Georgia." 300 $a"Title from title screen (viewed on May 23, 2014)." 300 $a"May 1979." 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (page 27). 606 $aLeadership 615 0$aLeadership. 700 $aDyer$b Frederick N.$01408962 702 $aHilligoss$b Richard E. 712 02$aU.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.$bARI Field Unit at Fort Benning, 801 0$bGPO 801 1$bGPO 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910705492903321 996 $aUsing an assessment center to predict field leadership performance of Army officers and NCOs$93494223 997 $aUNINA LEADER 02446nam 2200337 450 001 9910412267003321 005 20230830151912.0 024 7 $a10.5555/3355301 035 $a(CKB)5280000000244292 035 $a(NjHacI)995280000000244292 035 $a(EXLCZ)995280000000244292 100 $a20230830d2019 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aProceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Software Health /$fBram Adams [and four others] 210 1$aPiscataway, NJ, USA :$cIEEE Press,$d2019. 215 $a1 online resource (33 pages) $cillustrations 330 $aSoHeal 2019, the second edition of the International Workshop on Software Health has taken place in Montreal, Canada on May 28. As its previous edition, it was held in conjunction with the IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE). As such, SoHeal is establishing itself as an annual venue gathering researchers, industrials, practitioners and open source software community members to share their vision, experience and opinion on what constitutes software health and how such health should be supported, both at the level of software ecosystems and software communities. To date, there is no clear-cut definition of what constitutes software health, since it encompasses many different aspects of software design, development, evolution, deployment and operation, including success, longevity, growth, resilience, survival, diversity, sustainability, transparency, privacy, security, etc. Factors impacting software health can vary depending on the viewpoint of the involved stakeholders: process factors, technical factors concerning software artefacts (such as the source code, its documentation, log files, reviews, issue reports), social and cultural factors concerning the communities of software contributors and users, business factors concerning commercial and financial issues, legal factors such as licensing issues, ethical factors such as privacy preservation, and many more. 606 $aSoftware engineering$vCongresses 615 0$aSoftware engineering 676 $a005.1 700 $aAdams$b Bram$0867526 801 0$bNjHacI 801 1$bNjHacl 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910412267003321 996 $aProceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Software Health$93473666 997 $aUNINA