LEADER 02936 am 22005533u 450 001 9910131516003321 005 20230621140355.0 035 $a(CKB)3710000000499614 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001679955 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)16490938 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001679955 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)15023557 035 $a(PQKB)10344425 035 $a(WaSeSS)IndRDA00056010 035 $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/26888 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000499614 100 $a20160829d2014 uy | 101 0 $aslv 135 $aur||#|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 00$aLokalna demokracija IV $eAktualni problemi slovenske lokalne samouprave /$fIrena Ba?lija 210 $cInstitute for Local Self-Government and Public Procurement Maribor$d2015 210 31$aSlovenia :$cIns?titut za lokalno samoupravo in javna naroc?ila,$d2014 215 $a1 online resource (214 pages) $cillustrations; digital, PDF file(s) 225 0 $aLex Localis 300 $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph 311 $a961-6842-06-4 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 330 $aThe Slovenian constitution guarantees local self-government to all inhabitants and local self-government can be executed in municipalities and other local communities. Although municipalities are foundational units of local self-government, they experience some very basic problems since the re-establishment in the middle of 1990s; those problems are closely connected with inadequate exercise of subsidiarity and connection principles from in 1996 ratified European charter of local self-government. Slovenia has larger number of undersized municipalities that report problems with normative overload and their administrative incapacity. According to the findings of empirical study presented in the paper, the latter is often the case in municipalities smaller than 5000 inhabitants. The authors are also analysing inadequately defined scope of municipal jurisdiction; Slovenian municipalities are currently responsible for local affairs that affect only municipal inhabitants, and that narrow scope of jurisdiction is in many cases causing problems in managing the municipality, especially in cases of smaller municipalities. 606 $aLogic 606 $aPhilosophy 606 $aPhilosophy & Religion 610 $amunicipality 610 $alocal self-government 610 $alocal democracy 610 $aadministrative incapacity 615 0$aLogic. 615 0$aPhilosophy. 615 0$aPhilosophy & Religion. 700 $aBa?lija$b Irena$4auth$01366904 702 $aBaclija$b Irena 801 0$bPQKB 801 2$bUkMaJRU 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910131516003321 996 $aLokalna demokracija IV$93389422 997 $aUNINA LEADER 01708nam 2200457I 450 001 9910705151103321 005 20140303150654.0 035 $a(CKB)5470000002447846 035 $a(OCoLC)871256713 035 $a(EXLCZ)995470000002447846 100 $a20140303d2013 ua 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcn||||a|||| 181 $2rdacontent 182 $2rdamedia 183 $2rdacarrier 200 10$aTrends in infant formula rebate contracts $eimplications for the WIC Program /$fVictor Oliveira ; Elizabeth Fraza?o ; David Smallwood 210 1$a[Washington, D.C.] :$cUnited States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service,$d[2013] 215 $a1 online resource (ii pages, 2 unnumbered pages, 27 pages) $ccolor illustrations 225 1 $aEconomic information bulletin ;$vnumber 119 300 $aTitle from title screen (viewed Mar. 3, 2014). 300 $a"December 2013." 300 $aAccompanied by summary report. 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 23-24). 517 $aTrends in infant formula rebate contracts 606 $aInfant formulas$zUnited States$xCosts 606 $aRebates$zUnited States 606 $aInfant formula industry$zUnited States 615 0$aInfant formulas$xCosts. 615 0$aRebates 615 0$aInfant formula industry 700 $aOliveira$b Victor J.$01390138 702 $aFraza?o$b Elizabeth 702 $aSmallwood$b David 712 02$aUnited States.$bDepartment of Agriculture.$bEconomic Research Service, 801 0$bGPO 801 1$bGPO 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910705151103321 996 $aTrends in infant formula rebate contracts$93449072 997 $aUNINA