LEADER 02084nam 2200529I 450 001 9910704877903321 005 20150310164825.0 035 $a(CKB)5470000002444954 035 $a(OCoLC)904623066 035 $a(EXLCZ)995470000002444954 100 $a20150310j201304 ua 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurbn||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aProbabilistic analysis for comparing fatigue data based on Johnson-Weibull parameters /$fBrian L. Vlcek, Robert C. Hendricks and Erwin V. Zaretsky 210 1$aCleveland, Ohio :$cNational Aeronautics and Space Administration, Glenn Research Center,$dApril 2013. 215 $a1 online resource (13 pages) $cillustrations 225 1 $aNASA/TP ;$v2013-217633 300 $aTitle from title screen (viewed March 10, 2015). 300 $a"April 2013." 300 $a"Prepared for the International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference sponsored by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), Las Vegas, Nevada, September 4-7, 2007." 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 12-13). 606 $aAluminum alloys$2nasat 606 $aFailure analysis$2nasat 606 $aFatigue tests$2nasat 606 $aProbability theory$2nasat 606 $aStress analysis$2nasat 606 $aWeibull density functions$2nasat 615 7$aAluminum alloys. 615 7$aFailure analysis. 615 7$aFatigue tests. 615 7$aProbability theory. 615 7$aStress analysis. 615 7$aWeibull density functions. 700 $aVlcek$b Brian L.$01397003 702 $aHendricks$b Robert C. 702 $aZaretsky$b Erwin V. 712 02$aNASA Glenn Research Center, 712 02$aFundamental Aeronautics Program (U.S.), 801 0$bGPO 801 1$bGPO 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910704877903321 996 $aProbabilistic analysis for comparing fatigue data based on Johnson-Weibull parameters$93493847 997 $aUNINA LEADER 03527oam 2200613Mu 450 001 9910778887103321 005 20190503073429.0 010 $a0-262-28058-2 010 $a0-585-29647-2 035 $a(CKB)111004366633158 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000227713 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11202674 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000227713 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10270368 035 $a(PQKB)11399869 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3338433 035 $a(OCoLC)939263558 035 $a(OCoLC-P)939263558 035 $a(MaCbMITP)5579 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3338433 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr2001030 035 $a(PPN)055440541 035 $a(EXLCZ)99111004366633158 100 $a20160227d2015 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcn||||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aPrivatization, Restructuring and Regulation of Network Utilities 210 $aCambridge $cMIT Press$d2015 215 $axvi, 466 p. $cill 225 1 $aThe Walras-Pareto lectures ;$v2 300 $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph 311 $a0-262-14068-3 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. [439]-452) and index. 330 $aNetwork utilities, such as electricity, telephones, and gas, are public utilities that require a fixed network to deliver their services. Because consumers have no choice of network, they risk exploitation by network owners. Once invested, however, a network's capital is sunk, and the bargaining advantage shifts from investor to consumer. The investor, fearing expropriation, may be reluctant to invest. The tension between consumer and investor can be side-stepped by state ownership. Alternatively, private ownership and consumers' political power can be reconciled through regulation. Either way, network utilities operate under terms set by the state. David Newbery argues that price-setting rules comprise only part of the policy agenda. Network utilities pose special problems of ownership and regulation. He discusses the history of ownership and regulation, privatization, and theories of regulation. Examining three network utilities in detail--telecoms, electricity, and gas--he contrasts the regulatory approaches of Britain and the United States. He also looks at liberalization in a variety of other countries. History shows that the mature forms of regulatory institutions are emarkably similar under both public and private ownership. This raises obvious questions such as: Will the forces that caused convergence to regulated vertical integration in the past reassert themselves? Can the benefits of competition be protected against the pressure to reintegrate? Will different utilities differ in their form and structure? A full understanding of the forces shaping regulatory institutions is necessary to answer these important questions. 410 0$aWalras-Pareto lectures ;$v2. 606 $aPublic utilities 606 $aPrivatization 606 $aPublic utilities$xGovernment policy 610 $aINFORMATION SCIENCE/Technology & Policy 610 $aECONOMICS/Industrial Organization 615 0$aPublic utilities. 615 0$aPrivatization. 615 0$aPublic utilities$xGovernment policy. 676 $a363.6 700 $aNewbery$b David M$0118518 801 0$bOCoLC-P 801 1$bOCoLC-P 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910778887103321 996 $aPrivatization, restructuring, and regulation of network utilities$944518 997 $aUNINA