LEADER 01512nam  2200385   450 
001 9910704762003321
005 20130731154349.0
035   $a(CKB)5470000002444104
035   $a(OCoLC)854766664
035   $a(EXLCZ)995470000002444104
100   $a20130731d2013      ua             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurmn|||||||||
181   $2rdacontent
182   $2rdamedia
183   $2rdacarrier
200 10$aDefense infrastructure $eNavy's analysis of costs and benefits regarding Naval Station Mayport demonstrated some best practices and minimally addressed other requirements : report to congressional committees
210  1$a[Washington, D.C.] :$cUnited States Government Accountability Office,$d2013.
215   $a1 online resource (ii, 20 pages) $cillustrations
300   $aTitle from title screen (viewed July 16, 2013).
300   $a"May 2013."
300   $a"GAO-13-501."
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references.
517   $aDefense infrastructure 
606   $aDestroyers (Warships)$zUnited States$xMaintenance and repair$xCost effectiveness
606   $aNavy-yards and naval stations$zUnited States$xCost effectiveness
607   $aNaval Station Mayport (Fla.)
615  0$aDestroyers (Warships)$xMaintenance and repair$xCost effectiveness.
615  0$aNavy-yards and naval stations$xCost effectiveness.
801  0$bGPO
801  1$bGPO
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910704762003321
996   $aDefense infrastructure$93422856
997   $aUNINA