LEADER 01436nam  2200385I  450 
001 9910704411103321
005 20130405082130.0
035   $a(CKB)5470000002441588
035   $a(OCoLC)835939584
035   $a(EXLCZ)995470000002441588
100   $a20130405d2012      ua             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurmn|||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aShould ground-motion records be rotated to fault-normal/parallel or maximum direction for response history analysis of buildings? /$fby Juan C. Reyes and Erol Kalkan
210  1$aReston, Virginia :$cU.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey,$d2012.
215   $a1 online resource (xi, 81 pages) $ccolor illustrations
225 1 $aOpen-file report ;$v2012-1261
300   $aTitle from title screen (viewed on Apr. 5, 2013).
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 15-17).
606   $aEarthquake resistant design$zUnited States
606   $aEarthquake hazard analysis$zUnited States
615  0$aEarthquake resistant design
615  0$aEarthquake hazard analysis
700   $aReyes$b Juan C.$01415183
702   $aKalkan$b Erol
712 02$aGeological Survey (U.S.),
801  0$bGPO
801  1$bGPO
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910704411103321
996   $aShould ground-motion records be rotated to fault-normal$93516477
997   $aUNINA