LEADER 01658nam  2200433Ia 450 
001 996385106403316
005 20200824132459.0
035   $a(CKB)4940000000073585
035   $a(EEBO)2264206106
035   $a(OCoLC)ocm11781104e
035   $a(OCoLC)11781104
035   $a(EXLCZ)994940000000073585
100   $a19850308d1677      uy             |
101 0 $alat
135   $aurbn||||a|bb|
200 10$aIsocratis orationes duę$b[electronic resource] $e1. Ad Demonicum, 2. Ad Nicoclem : nova? methodo & apprime? utili, quoad verbum & sensum latine? redditae, Gręcismis, phrasibus & sententiis, in quibus maxima vis rei consistit, locupletatę, notis & rationibus, quod loca difficiliora & obscuriora, ita illustratę, ut facillim`e `a quovis Gręcarum literarnm [sic] studioso intelligi possint
205   $aEditio secunda /$baucta & emendata, studio & opera? G. Sylvani Pannonii, Med.
210   $aOxonii $cExcudit H.H. Academię Typographus $cSumptibus Authoris$d1677
215   $a[8], 104 p
300   $aReproduction of original in St. John's College Library, Cambridge University.
330   $aeebo-0203
606   $aGreek literature$vTranslations into Latin
606   $aLatin literature$vTranslations
615  0$aGreek literature
615  0$aLatin literature
700   $aIsocrates$0186464
701  2$aIsocrates$0186464
701   $aSylvanus$b Georgius$01001888
801  0$bEAJ
801  1$bEAJ
801  2$bUMI
801  2$bEAA
801  2$bm/c
801  2$bEAA
801  2$bWaOLN
906   $aBOOK
912   $a996385106403316
996   $aIsocratis orationes duę$92299538
997   $aUNISA

LEADER 02400oam  2200541   450 
001 9910703446303321
005 20130730142526.0
035   $a(CKB)5470000002431242
035   $a(OCoLC)834455990
035   $a(EXLCZ)995470000002431242
100   $a20130402d2013      ua             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurmn|||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aComparison of two regression-based approaches for determining nutrient and sediment fluxes and trends in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed /$fby Douglas L. Moyer, Robert M. Hirsch, and Kenneth E. Hyer ; prepared in cooperation with the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program
205   $aRev. March 12, 2013.
210  1$aReston, Virginia :$cU.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey,$d2013.
215   $a1 online resource (x, 118 pages) $cillustrations, map
225 1 $aScientific investigations report ;$v2012-5244
300   $aDate of publication from USGS web site.
300   $aTitle from title screen (viewed Apr. 1, 2013).
311   $a1-4113-3525-2 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 54-55).
606   $aWater quality$zChesapeake Bay Watershed$xMeasurement
606   $aNutrient pollution of water$zChesapeake Bay Watershed$xMeasurement
606   $aSedimentation and deposition$zChesapeake Bay Watershed$xMeasurement
607   $aChesapeake Bay Watershed
615  0$aWater quality$xMeasurement.
615  0$aNutrient pollution of water$xMeasurement.
615  0$aSedimentation and deposition$xMeasurement.
700   $aMoyer$b Douglas L.$01388494
702   $aHirsch$b Robert M.
702   $aHyer$b Kenneth E$g(Kenneth Edward),
712 02$aVirginia.$bDepartment of Environmental Quality,
712 02$aMaryland.$bDepartment of Natural Resources,
712 02$aChesapeake Bay Program (U.S.),
712 02$aGeological Survey (U.S.),
801  0$bGPO
801  1$bGPO
801  2$bOCLCA
801  2$bOCLCQ
801  2$bGPO
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910703446303321
996   $aComparison of two regression-based approaches for determining nutrient and sediment fluxes and trends in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed$93478539
997   $aUNINA