LEADER 01709oam  2200421Ia 450 
001 9910703286703321
005 20110720100341.0
035   $a(CKB)4970000000023058
035   $a(OCoLC)664815725
035   $a(EXLCZ)994970000000023058
100   $a20100922d2010      ua             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurmn|||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aDefense planning$b[electronic resource] $eDOD needs to review the costs and benefits of basing alternatives for Army forces in Europe /$f[John Pendleton]
210  1$aWashington, DC :$cU.S. Govt. Accountability Office,$d[2010]
215   $a1 online resource (18 pages) $cillustrations, map
300   $aTitle from PDF caption (GAO, viewed Sept. 22, 2010).
300   $a"September 13, 2010."
300   $a"GAO-10-745R."
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references.
327   $aScope and methodology -- Summary -- Background -- Future plans for Army forces in Europe are uncertain, but costs are likely to be higher than earlier Army estimates -- Inconsistent processes to develop facility requirements hampers validation of facility needs -- Conclusions.
517   $aDefense Planning
606   $aMilitary bases, American$zForeign countries$xCosts
606   $aMilitary planning$zUnited States
615  0$aMilitary bases, American$xCosts.
615  0$aMilitary planning
700   $aPendleton$b John$01396497
712 02$aUnited States.$bGovernment Accountability Office.
801  0$bAWC
801  1$bAWC
801  2$bGPO
906   $aDOCUMENT
912   $a9910703286703321
996   $aDefense planning$93470917
997   $aUNINA