LEADER 01770nam 2200421 a 450 001 9910702271103321 005 20121126110915.0 035 $a(CKB)5470000002425435 035 $a(OCoLC)819330764 035 $a(EXLCZ)995470000002425435 100 $a20121126d2012 ua 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcn||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aBoat wakes and their influence on erosion in the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, North Carolina$b[electronic resource] /$f[Mark S. Fonseca and Amit Malhotra] 210 1$aBeaufort, N.C. :$cNOAA National Ocean Service, National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, Center for Coastal Fisheries and Habitat Research,$d[2012] 215 $a1 online resource (iii, 24 pages) $ccolor illustrations, color,maps 225 1 $aNOAA Technical Memorandum NOS NCCOS ;$v# 143 300 $aTitle from title screen (viewed on Nov. 16, 2012). 300 $a"March 2012." 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (page 9). 606 $aWakes (Fluid dynamics)$xEnvironmental aspects$zUnited States 606 $aBoats and boating$xEnvironmental aspects$zUnited States 606 $aBeach erosion$zUnited States 615 0$aWakes (Fluid dynamics)$xEnvironmental aspects 615 0$aBoats and boating$xEnvironmental aspects 615 0$aBeach erosion 700 $aFonseca$b Mark S$01407888 701 $aMalhotra$b Amit$01422364 712 02$aCenter for Coastal Fisheries and Habitat Research (U.S.) 801 0$bGPO 801 1$bGPO 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910702271103321 996 $aBoat wakes and their influence on erosion in the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, North Carolina$93546469 997 $aUNINA LEADER 04809nam 22006731c 450 001 9910154701103321 005 20200115203623.0 010 $a9781472551009 010 $a1472551001 010 $a9780567170057 010 $a0567170055 024 7 $a10.5040/9781472551009 035 $a(CKB)2670000000419633 035 $a(EBL)1394939 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001188701 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11695100 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001188701 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11139732 035 $a(PQKB)11744588 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1394939 035 $a(OCoLC)1097146518 035 $a(UtOrBLW)bpp09255180 035 $a(UtOrBLW)BP9781472551009BC 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000419633 100 $a20140929d2013 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 14$aThe theological role of paradox in the Gospel of Mark $fLaura C. Sweat 210 1$aLondon $cBloomsbury $d2013. 215 $a1 online resource (223 p.) 225 1 $aLibrary of New Testament studies $v492 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 08$a9780567662576 311 08$a0567662578 311 08$a9780567215703 311 08$a0567215709 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index 327 $apt. 1. Parables -- pt. 2. Passion 327 $aIntroduction -- Part One: Parables -- 1. Paradox Introduced -- 2. A First Paradox: Concealment and Revelation -- 3. A Second Paradox: Scripture Both Countered and Confirmed -- 4. A Third Paradox: Sowing Abundant Waste -- Part Two: Passion -- 5. Paradoxical Proclamations: Waste and Bounty at Bethany -- 6. Challenging Scripture and Concealing Action: Gethsemane -- 7. Climactic Concealment and the Wastefully Sent Son: Golgotha -- 8. The Promise of Paradoxes: The Empty Tomb -- 9. Conclusion 330 $a"Scholarship on the Gospel of Mark has long been convinced of the paradoxical description of two of its primary themes, christology and discipleship. This book argues that paradoxical language pervades the entire narrative, and that it serves a theological purpose in describing God's activity. Part One focuses on divine action present in Mark 4:10-12. In the first paradox, Mark portrays God's revelatory acts as consistently accompanied by concealment. The second paradox is shown in the various ways in which divine action confirms, yet counters, scripture. Finally, Mark describes God's actions in ways that indicate both wastefulness and goodness; deeds that are further illuminated by the ongoing, yet defeated, presence of evil. Part Two demonstrates that this paradoxical language is widely attested across Mark's passion narrative, as he continues to depict God's activity with the use of the three paradoxes observed in Mark 4. Through paradoxical narrative, Mark emphasizes God's transcendence and presence, showing that even though Jesus has brought revelation, a complete understanding of God remains tantalizingly out of their grasp until the eschaton (4:22)."--Bloomsbury Publishing 330 8 $aScholarship on the Gospel of Mark has long been convinced of the paradoxical description of two of its primary themes, christology and discipleship. This book argues that paradoxical language pervades the entire narrative, and that it serves a theological purpose in describing God's activity. Part One focuses on divine action present in Mark 4:10-12. In the first paradox, Mark portrays God's revelatory acts as consistently accompanied by concealment. The second paradox is shown in the various ways in which divine action confirms, yet counters, scripture. Finally, Mark describes God's actions in ways that indicate both wastefulness and goodness; deeds that are further illuminated by the ongoing, yet defeated, presence of evil. Part Two demonstrates that this paradoxical language is widely attested across Mark's passion narrative, as he continues to depict God's activity with the use of the three paradoxes observed in Mark 4. Through paradoxical narrative, Mark emphasizes God's transcendence and presence, showing that even though Jesus has brought revelation, a complete understanding of God remains tantalizingly out of their grasp until the eschaton (4:22) 410 0$aLibrary of New Testament studies ;$v492. 606 $aParadox in the Bible 606 $2Biblical studies & exegesis 606 $aChristian life 615 0$aParadox in the Bible. 615 0$aChristian life. 676 $a226.306 700 $aSweat$b Laura C.$01263124 801 0$bUtOrBLW 801 1$bUtOrBLW 801 2$bUkLoBP 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910154701103321 996 $aThe theological role of paradox in the Gospel of Mark$92960087 997 $aUNINA