LEADER 03744oam 2200457 a 450 001 9910701847903321 005 20190524175234.0 035 $a(CKB)5470000002421629 035 $a(OCoLC)790491201 035 $a(EXLCZ)995470000002421629 100 $a20120427d2012 ua 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurbn||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aAmbassador Stephen Krasner's orienting principle for foreign policy (and military management)$b[electronic resource] $eresponsible sovereignty /$fMax G. Manwaring 210 1$aCarlisle, PA :$cStrategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College,$d[2012] 215 $a1 online resource (viii, 44 pages) 225 1 $aAdvancing strategic thought series 300 $aTitle from PDF title page (viewed on April 27, 2012). 300 $a"April 2012." 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 38-44). 327 $aThe contemporary security dilemma and the responsible sovereignty issue : toward an orienting principle for foreign policy and military management -- The essential architecture for a foundation of moral legitimacy -- Some considerations for foreign policymakers, and others -- Some considerations for military management, and policymakers -- Recommendations. 330 $aThe principle security threat of the past several centuries -- war between or among major powers -- is gone. Two new types of threats have been introduced into the global security arena. Violent nonstate actors and other indirect political, economic, and social causes of poverty, social exclusion, corruption, terrorism, transnational crime, the global drug problem, and gangs are a few examples of these "new" threats to global security and stability. More and more, national security implies protection -- through a variety of nonmilitary and military ways and means -- of popular interests that add up to well-being. This broadened definition of the contemporary security problem makes the concept so vague as to render it useless as an analytical tool. The genius of Ambassador Stephen Krasner, however, helps solve the problem. His orienting principle for foreign policy and military management (responsible sovereignty/legitimate governance) focuses on the need to create nation-states capable of legitimate governance and to realize stability, security, and well-being for citizens. This concept has serious implications for the transition and relevance of armed forces and other instruments of power, as well as foreign policy. Thus, we: 1) define the contemporary security dilemma and the larger principle of Krasner's responsible sovereignty; 2) outline the major components of a legitimate governance paradigm; 3) discuss some considerations for foreign policymaking and military management; and, 4) argue that substantially more sophisticated security-stability concepts, policy structures, and decision and policymaking precautions are necessary if the United States is to play more effectively in the security arena now and in the future. 517 $aAmbassador Stephen Krasner's orienting principle for foreign policy 606 $aNational security 606 $aInternational relations 606 $aMilitary policy 615 0$aNational security. 615 0$aInternational relations. 615 0$aMilitary policy. 700 $aManwaring$b Max G$01169290 712 02$aArmy War College (U.S.).$bStrategic Studies Institute. 801 0$bAWC 801 1$bAWC 801 2$bGPO 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910701847903321 996 $aAmbassador Stephen Krasner's orienting principle for foreign policy (and military management)$93441546 997 $aUNINA