LEADER 01668oam  2200433 a 450 
001 9910701082603321
005 20111028131827.0
035   $a(CKB)5470000002414208
035   $a(OCoLC)755925670
035   $a(EXLCZ)995470000002414208
100   $a20111005d2011      ua             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurcn|||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 00$aDifferences between standing and downed dead tree wood density reduction factors$b[electronic resource] $ea comparison across decay classes and tree species /$fMark E. Harmon ... [and others]
210  1$aNewtown Square, PA :$cU.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station,$d[2011]
215   $a1 online resource (ii unnumbered pages, 40 pages) $cillustrations
225 1 $aResearch paper ;$vNRS-15
300   $aTitle from title screen (viewed on Oct. 5, 2011).
300   $a"August 2011"--P. [ii].
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 15-17).
517   $aDifferences between standing and downed dead tree wood density reduction factors 
606   $aCoarse woody debris
606   $aWood$xDeterioration
606   $aDead trees
615  0$aCoarse woody debris.
615  0$aWood$xDeterioration.
615  0$aDead trees.
701   $aHarmon$b Mark E$01404309
712 02$aUnited States.$bForest Service.$bNorthern Research Station.
801  0$bORE
801  1$bORE
801  2$bGPO
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910701082603321
996   $aDifferences between standing and downed dead tree wood density reduction factors$93478687
997   $aUNINA