LEADER 01492nam  2200397 a 450 
001 9910700996403321
005 20110829124333.0
035   $a(CKB)5470000002413059
035   $a(OCoLC)748273701
035   $a(EXLCZ)995470000002413059
100   $a20110829d2010      ua             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurcn|||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 00$aCaBIG® Integration Hub$b[electronic resource] $eclinical trials workflow integration
210  1$a[Bethesda, Md.] :$cU.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute,$d[2010]
215   $a1 online resource (2 unnumbered pages) $ccolor illustrations
225 1 $aNIH publication ;$vno. 10-7532
300   $aTitle from title screen (viewed on Aug. 29, 2011).
300   $a"Printed February 2010."
517   $aCaBIG Integration Hub 
606   $aClinical trials$xReporting$xComputer programs
606   $aRecording and registration$xData processing$xComputer programs
606   $aElectronic data interchange
615  0$aClinical trials$xReporting$xComputer programs.
615  0$aRecording and registration$xData processing$xComputer programs.
615  0$aElectronic data interchange.
712 02$aNational Cancer Institute (U.S.)
801  0$bGPO
801  1$bGPO
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910700996403321
996   $aCaBIG® Integration Hub$93526376
997   $aUNINA

LEADER 02024nam  2200529   450 
001 9910824199903321
005 20230725063632.0
010   $a0-309-15005-1
035   $a(CKB)3710000001052071
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4799796
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL4799796
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr11337899
035   $a(OCoLC)972291909
035   $a(EXLCZ)993710000001052071
100   $a20200110d2010      uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurcnu||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 02$aA data-based assessment of research-doctorate programs in the United States /$fCommittee on an Assessment of Research Doctorate Programs ; Jeremiah P. Ostriker, Charlotte V. Kuh, and James A. Voytuk, editors
210  1$aWashington, District of Columbia :$cThe National Academies Press,$d[2010]
210  4$d©2010
215   $a1 online resource (xviii, 304 pages)
311   $a0-309-15004-3 
606   $aDoctor of philosophy degree$zUnited States$xEvaluation
606   $aUniversities and colleges$zUnited States$xGraduate work$xEvaluation
606   $aUniversities and colleges$zRatings and ranking$xUnited States
606   $aResearch$zUnited States$xEvaluation
606   $aEducational surveys$zUnited States
615  0$aDoctor of philosophy degree$xEvaluation.
615  0$aUniversities and colleges$xGraduate work$xEvaluation.
615  0$aUniversities and colleges$xUnited States.
615  0$aResearch$xEvaluation.
615  0$aEducational surveys
676   $a378.2
702   $aOstriker$b J. P.
702   $aKuh$b Charlotte V.
702   $aVoytuk$b James A.
712 02$aNational Research Council (U.S.).$bCommittee on an Assessment of Research Doctorate Programs,
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910824199903321
996   $aA data-based assessment of research-doctorate programs in the United States$94011058
997   $aUNINA