LEADER 03099nam 2200589 450 001 9910460635603321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a1-60917-093-8 035 $a(CKB)3710000000445801 035 $a(EBL)2169848 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001514900 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12621938 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001514900 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11480306 035 $a(PQKB)11273661 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3433759 035 $a(OCoLC)608482215 035 $a(MdBmJHUP)muse48503 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3433759 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr11078036 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000445801 100 $a20070828h20072007 ub| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|||||||nn|n 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aJudging the Supreme Court $econstructions of motives in Bush v. Gore /$fClarke Rountree 210 1$aEast Lansing :$cMichigan State University Press,$d[2007] 210 4$dİ2007 215 $a1 online resource (527 p.) 225 1 $aRhetoric and public affairs series 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a0-87013-809-X 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aJudicial motives in American jurisprudence -- The road to Bush v. Gore -- The United States Supreme Court decides the election -- The dissent reconstructs majority action -- Reporters reconstruct the Supreme Court's action -- Editorialists reconstruct Bush v. Gore -- Scholars reconstruct the stay decision -- Scholars reconstruct how the court reached its decision -- Scholars reconstruct why the court reached its decision -- Scholars reconstruct who decided Bush v. Gore -- Scholars reconstruct when and where the court reached its decision and what it was doing -- Scholars reconstruct Rehnquist's concurring opinion -- Judging the Supreme Court and its judges. 330 $aThis volume questions the motives of Supreme Court justices in a landmark case: The Supreme Court's intervention in the presidential election of 2000, and its subsequent decision in favor of George W. Bush, elicited immediate, heated, and widespread debate. Critics argued that the justices used weak legal arguments to overturn the Florida Supreme Court's ruling, ending a ballot recount and awarding the presidency to Bush. More fundamentally, they questioned the motives of conservative judges who arrived at a decision in favor of the candidate who reflected their political leanings. 410 0$aRhetoric and public affairs series. 606 $aContested elections$zUnited States$xHistory 606 $aPolitical questions and judicial power$zUnited States$xHistory 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aContested elections$xHistory. 615 0$aPolitical questions and judicial power$xHistory. 676 $a347.73/26 700 $aRountree$b Clarke$f1958-$0857205 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910460635603321 996 $aJudging the Supreme Court$91914138 997 $aUNINA LEADER 01310nam 2200373 a 450 001 9910700317203321 005 20110601073621.0 035 $a(CKB)5470000002409818 035 $a(OCoLC)727926444 035 $a(EXLCZ)995470000002409818 100 $a20110601d2010 ua 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurmn||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aSocial Security Administration$b[electronic resource] $emanagement oversight needed to ensure accurate treatment of state and local government employees : report to congressional requesters 210 1$a[Washington, D.C.] :$cU.S. Govt. Accountability Office,$d[2010] 215 $a1 online resource (iii, 53 pages) $cillustrations, map 300 $aTitle from PDF title screen (GAO, viewed May 31, 2011). 300 $a"September 2010." 300 $a"GAO-10-938." 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 517 $aSocial Security Administration 606 $aSocial security$zUnited States 606 $aCivil service$zUnited States 615 0$aSocial security 615 0$aCivil service 801 0$bGPO 801 1$bGPO 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910700317203321 996 $aSocial Security Administration$93424096 997 $aUNINA