LEADER 01864nam  2200517Ia 450 
001 9910700301803321
005 20110624161432.0
035   $a(CKB)5470000002409974
035   $a(OCoLC)732900687
035   $a(EXLCZ)995470000002409974
100   $a20110624d2010      ua             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurcn|||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aNumerical comparison of NASA's dual Brayton power generation system performance using CO? or N? as the working fluid$b[electronic resource] /$fAlbert K. Owen, Thomas M. Lavelle, David S. Hervol
210  1$aCleveland, Ohio :$cNational Aeronautics and Space Administration, Glenn Research Center,$d[2010]
215   $a1 online resource (10 pages) $ccolor illustrations
225 1 $aNASA/TM ;$v2010-216949
300   $aTitle from title screen (viewed on June 23, 2011).
300   $a"December 2010."
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references (page 10).
606   $aBrayton cycle$2nasat
606   $aClosed cycles$2nasat
606   $aFluid power$2nasat
606   $aCarbon dioxide$2nasat
606   $aHeat sources$2nasat
606   $aPropulsion$2nasat
615  7$aBrayton cycle.
615  7$aClosed cycles.
615  7$aFluid power.
615  7$aCarbon dioxide.
615  7$aHeat sources.
615  7$aPropulsion.
700   $aOwen$b Albert K$01410042
701   $aLavelle$b Thomas M$01416845
701   $aHervol$b David S$01408110
712 02$aNASA Glenn Research Center.
712 02$aU.S. Army Research Laboratory.
801  0$bGPO
801  1$bGPO
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910700301803321
996   $aNumerical comparison of NASA's dual Brayton power generation system performance using CO? or N? as the working fluid$93523586
997   $aUNINA