LEADER 01432nam  2200385 a 450 
001 9910700216603321
005 20110517124054.0
035   $a(CKB)5470000002408814
035   $a(OCoLC)724554517
035   $a(EXLCZ)995470000002408814
100   $a20110517d2011      ua             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurcn|||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 12$aA comparison of various methods used to determine the sample size requirements for meeting a 90/90 reliability specification$b[electronic resource] /$fDavid W. Webb
210  1$aAberdeen Proving Ground, MD :$cArmy Research Laboratory,$d[2011]
215   $a1 online resource (vi, 18 pages) $cillustrations (some color)
225 1 $aARL-TR ;$v5468
300   $aTitle from title screen (viewed on May 17, 2011).
300   $a"March 2011."
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references (page 15).
606   $aReliability (Engineering)$xMathematical models
606   $aProbabilities
615  0$aReliability (Engineering)$xMathematical models.
615  0$aProbabilities.
700   $aWebb$b David W$01410331
712 02$aU.S. Army Research Laboratory.
801  0$bGPO
801  1$bGPO
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910700216603321
996   $aA comparison of various methods used to determine the sample size requirements for meeting a 90$93498780
997   $aUNINA