LEADER 01722oam 2200577I 450 001 9910458462903321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a1-135-33210-X 010 $a1-282-37654-3 010 $a9786612376542 010 $a1-84314-716-5 024 7 $a10.4324/9781843147169 035 $a(CKB)1000000000402499 035 $a(EBL)3060846 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000385107 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11268816 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000385107 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10344891 035 $a(PQKB)10858288 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3060846 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3060846 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10398859 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL237654 035 $a(OCoLC)905800733 035 $a(OCoLC)889813452 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000402499 100 $a20180331d2004 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aAlternative dispute resolution $ea developing world perspective /$fAlbert Fiadjoe 210 1$aLondon :$cCavendish,$d2004. 215 $a1 online resource (179 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a1-138-13189-X 311 $a1-85941-912-7 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $a""BOOK COVER""; ""TITLE""; ""COPYRIGHT""; ""CONTENTS"" 606 $aDispute resolution (Law) 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aDispute resolution (Law) 676 $a347.09 700 $aFiadjoe$b Albert K.$0907855 801 0$bFlBoTFG 801 1$bFlBoTFG 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910458462903321 996 $aAlternative dispute resolution$92030727 997 $aUNINA LEADER 03249nam 2200469z 450 001 9910698573403321 005 20230314174908.0 035 $a(CKB)3790000000564621 035 $a(OCoLC)239584322 035 $a(OCoLC)1228904355 035 $a(EXLCZ)993790000000564621 100 $a20180225d2012 ua 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 00$aAir Force Materiel Command reorganization analysis $efinal report /$fRobert S. Tripp [et al.] 210 1$aSanta Monica, CA :$cRand,$d2012. 215 $axxii, 159 pages $ccolor illustrations 225 1 $aRand Corporation monograph series 300 $a"Project Air Force." 311 0 $a0-8330-7624-8 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 155-159). 327 $aCh. 1. Background, Purpose, and Analytic Approach -- Ch. 2. Background, Purpose, and Analytic Approach -- Ch. 3. Background, Purpose, and Analytic Approach -- Ch. 4. Life-Cycle Management Alternatives: An Assessment of Two Options -- Ch. 5. Life-Cycle Management Alternatives: An Assessment of Two Options -- Ch. 6. Conclusions and Recommendations. 330 $a"Directives from the Office of the Secretary of Defense mandating reductions in operations and maintenance staffing levels led Air Force Materiel Command (AFMC) to reexamine how it operates; the command published the plan for its proposed reorganization in November 2011. In response, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 directed the Secretary of the Air Force to have a federally funded research and development center provide an independent review of the proposed reorganization. In January 2012, RAND Project AIR FORCE was tasked to conduct this review, the purpose of which was to describe the functional responsibilities, manpower authorizations, and disposition of AFMC's proposed restructure, including an assessment of life-cycle costs; to independently assess how realignments would likely affect life-cycle management, weapon system sustainment, and support to the warfighter; and to examine options for providing effective and efficient weapon system life-cycle management. The resulting analysis was limited to how the reorganization would affect product development/support-system design and operations support (depot maintenance and Air Force supply chain operations). It did not examine how the reorganization affects the management of nuclear weapons, developmental testing, or laboratory and basic research. For context, the report also includes a comprehensive overview of the history of Air Force life-cycle management and the changing roles and responsibilities of the organizational precursors to AFMC."--P. [4] of cover. 410 0$aRand Corporation monograph series. 701 $aTripp$b Robert S.$f1944-$01351505 712 02$aProject Air Force (U.S.) 801 0$bBTCTA 801 1$bBTCTA 801 2$bYDXCP 801 2$bSCT 801 2$bTXA 801 2$bBDX 801 2$bCOD 801 2$bBWX 801 2$bDLC 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910698573403321 996 $aAir Force Materiel Command reorganization analysis$93114193 997 $aUNINA