LEADER 00915nam a22002531i 4500 001 991001940799707536 005 20030414160500.0 008 030925s1899 it |||||||||||||||||ita 035 $ab12218996-39ule_inst 035 $aARCHE-026664$9ExL 040 $aBiblioteca Interfacoltà$bita$cA.t.i. Arché s.c.r.l. Pandora Sicilia s.r.l. 082 04$a909.04 100 1 $aCastelli, David$0235876 245 14$aGli ebrei :$bsunto di storia politica e letteraria /$cdi David Castelli 260 $aFirenze :$bG. Barbèra,$c1899 300 $aXVI, 464 p. ;$c19 cm 650 4$aEbrei$xStoria 907 $a.b12218996$b02-04-14$c08-10-03 912 $a991001940799707536 945 $aLE002 909.04 CAS 945 $aLE002 It. II N 12$g1$i2002000085511$lle002$o-$pE0.00$q-$rn$so $t0$u0$v0$w0$x0$y.i1259961x$z08-10-03 996 $aEbrei$9155844 997 $aUNISALENTO 998 $ale002$b08-10-03$cm$da $e-$fita$git $h4$i1 LEADER 07646nam 2200457 450 001 9910698254003321 005 20230306033912.0 035 $a(CKB)3890000000002774 035 $a(NjHacI)993890000000002774 035 $a(OCoLC)71126912 035 $a(EXLCZ)993890000000002774 100 $a20230306d2006 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 14$aThe Army's future combat systems $eprogram and alternatives /$fFrances M. Lussier, Leah Mazade 210 1$aWashington, D.C. :$cCongressional Budget Office,$d2006. 215 $a1 online resource (xxv, 84 pages) 225 1 $aCBO study 300 $aTitle from title screen (viewed on Aug. 24, 2006). 300 $a"Frances M. Lussier of CBO's National Security Division prepared this study ... Leah Mazade edited the report"-- p. iii. 300 $aDistributed to depository libraries in paper, shipping list no. 2006-0314-P. 300 $a"August 2006." 300 $aPaper version available for sale by the Supt. of Docs. U.S. G.P.O. 330 $aRoughly half of the Army's combat forces at the end of 2005 were so-called heavy units-forces that are equipped with armored vehicles and that provide significant firepower. To support those units, the Army maintains a fleet of approximately 28,000 armored vehicles. Now that the Cold War is over, some defense experts have questioned the relevance of such vehicles to the current national security strategy and their continued usefulness (notwithstanding their contributions to recent operations, such as Desert Storm and Iraqi Freedom). The average age of the armored combat vehicle fleet at the end of 2005 was relatively high, and the fleet comprises vehicles designed several decades ago. Moreover, units equipped with the vehicles in the current fleet are too large and too heavy to be moved overseas easily and quickly by the Air Force's C-17s, the most numerous of its long-range transport planes. For all practical purposes, heavy units must be transported overseas by ship-a process that takes weeks. In today's environment of rapidly evolving conflicts, the Army's goal is to have units that have the combat power of heavy units but that can be transported anywhere in the world in a matter of days. To address concerns about the armored vehicle fleet's aging and the difficulties involved in transporting it-as well as to equip the Army more suitably to conduct operations overseas on short notice using forces based in the United States-the service created the Future Combat Systems (FCS) program in 2000. A major modernization effort, the program is designed in part to develop and purchase vehicles to replace those now in the heavy forces; the new vehicles would be much lighter, thereby easing the deployment of units equipped with them. But the FCS program, poised to develop a total of 18 new systems (including eight manned vehicles to replace those in the Army's current armored fleet) and a network to connect them all will not field any new vehicles until December 2014 at the earliest. Furthermore, because those new vehicles will be expensive, the Army plans to buy relatively small quantities of them each year. As a result, the armored vehicles now in the Army's combat units will not all be replaced by FCS components until after 2035, a prospect that has evoked concerns about the costs of maintaining those older vehicles and upgrading them to prevent their becoming obsolete. In addition, questions have been raised about the FCS program's technical feasibility and affordability. Some experts doubt that the Army can develop and test the necessary technologies in time to start producing lightweight manned vehicles by 2012-a requisite for meeting the deadline to field them according to the Army's current schedule. Another concern is funding for the quantities of FCS equipment that the Army is now planning to buy. Any reduction in the FCS procurement rate would force the Army to retain its already aging armored vehicles even longer and to invest more funds in their maintenance.Roughly half of the Army's combat forces at the end of 2005 were so-called heavy units-forces that are equipped with armored vehicles and that provide significant firepower. To support those units, the Army maintains a fleet of approximately 28,000 armored vehicles. Now that the Cold War is over, some defense experts have questioned the relevance of such vehicles to the current national security strategy and their continued usefulness (notwithstanding their contributions to recent operations, such as Desert Storm and Iraqi Freedom). The average age of the armored combat vehicle fleet at the end of 2005 was relatively high, and the fleet comprises vehicles designed several decades ago. Moreover, units equipped with the vehicles in the current fleet are too large and too heavy to be moved overseas easily and quickly by the Air Force's C-17s, the most numerous of its long-range transport planes. For all practical purposes, heavy units must be transported overseas by ship-a process that takes weeks. In today's environment of rapidly evolving conflicts, the Army's goal is to have units that have the combat power of heavy units but that can be transported anywhere in the world in a matter of days. To address concerns about the armored vehicle fleet's aging and the difficulties involved in transporting it-as well as to equip the Army more suitably to conduct operations overseas on short notice using forces based in the United States-the service created the Future Combat Systems (FCS) program in 2000. A major modernization effort, the program is designed in part to develop and purchase vehicles to replace those now in the heavy forces; the new vehicles would be much lighter, thereby easing the deployment of units equipped with them. But the FCS program, poised to develop a total of 18 new systems (including eight manned vehicles to replace those in the Army's current armored fleet) and a network to connect them all will not field any new vehicles until December 2014 at the earliest. Furthermore, because those new vehicles will be expensive, the Army plans to buy relatively small quantities of them each year. As a result, the armored vehicles now in the Army's combat units will not all be replaced by FCS components until after 2035, a prospect that has evoked concerns about the costs of maintaining those older vehicles and upgrading them to prevent their becoming obsolete. In addition, questions have been raised about the FCS program's technical feasibility and affordability. Some experts doubt that the Army can develop and test the necessary technologies in time to start producing lightweight manned vehicles by 2012-a requisite for meeting the deadline to field them according to the Army's current schedule. Another concern is funding for the quantities of FCS equipment that the Army is now planning to buy. Any reduction in the FCS procurement rate would force the Army to retain its already aging armored vehicles even longer and to invest more funds in their maintenance. 410 0$aCBO study. 517 $aArmy's Future Combat Systems 606 $aMilitary art and science 615 0$aMilitary art and science. 676 $a355.82 700 $aLussier$b Frances M.$01352964 702 $aMazade$b Leah 712 02$aUnited States.$bCongressional Budget Office. 801 0$bNjHacI 801 1$bNjHacl 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910698254003321 996 $aThe Army's future combat systems$93211920 997 $aUNINA LEADER 04947nam 22006975 450 001 9910255359903321 005 20240718184248.0 010 $a9781137542229 010 $a1137542225 024 7 $a10.1057/978-1-137-54222-9 035 $a(CKB)3710000001177346 035 $a(DE-He213)978-1-137-54222-9 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4843558 035 $a(Perlego)3506589 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000001177346 100 $a20170418d2017 u| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurnn#008mamaa 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aGerman Ecocriticism in the Anthropocene /$fedited by Caroline Schaumann, Heather I. Sullivan 205 $a1st ed. 2017. 210 1$aNew York :$cPalgrave Macmillan US :$cImprint: Palgrave Macmillan,$d2017. 215 $a1 online resource (XI, 348 p. 4 illus.) 225 1 $aLiteratures, Cultures, and the Environment,$x2946-3165 311 08$a9781137559852 311 08$a1137559853 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references at the end of each chapters and index. 327 $gMachine generated contents note:$gpt. I$tEcological Systems and Place in the Anthropocene --$tThe Dark Pastoral: A Trope for the Anthropocene /$rHeather I. Sullivan --$tGoethe's Faust and the Ecolinguistics of /$rSimon Richter --$tAdalbert Stifter's Alternative Anthropocene: Reimagining Social Nature in Brigitta and Abdias /$rAlexander Phillips --$tThe Senses of Slovenia: Peter Handke, Stanley Cavell, and the Environmental Ethics of Repetition /$rBernhard Malkmus --$gpt. II$tVibrant Matter: Rocks, Mines, Air, and Food --$t"Mines aren't really like that": German Romantic Undergrounds Revisited /$rKate Rigby --$t(Bad) Air and (Faulty) Inspiration: Elemental and Environmental Influences on Fontane /$rEvi Zemanek --$tPerforming Hunger: Fasting in Franz Kafka's Hunger Artist as Poetic Practice /$rCora L. Wilke-Gray --$tSpeaking Stones: Material Agency and Interaction in Christian Enzensberger's Geschichte der Natur /$rCaroline Schaumann --$gpt. III$tCatastrophe, Crisis, and Cultural Exploitation --$tWhen Nature Strikes Back: The Inconvenient Apocalypse in Franz Hohler's Der Neue Berg /$rChristoph Weber --$tNational Invective and Environmental Exploitation in Thomas Bernhard's Frost /$rSean Ireton --$tGerman Film Ventures into the Amazon: Werner Herzog's Fitzcarraldo as Prelude to Michal Marczak's Eco-documentary /$rBrad Prager --$tAssessing How We Assess Environmental Risk: Kathrin Roggla's Documentary Film The Mobile Future /$rKatharina Gerstenberger --$gpt. IV$tGenres in the Anthropocene --$tWriting After Nature: A Sebaldian Ecopoetics /$rJason Groves --$tTelling the Story of Climate Change: The German Novel in the Anthropocene /$rAxel Goodbody --$tThe Anthropocene in Contemporary German Ecothrillers /$rGabriele Durbeck. 330 $aThis book offers essays on both canonical and non-canonical German-language texts and films, advancing ecocritical models for German Studies, and introducing environmental issues in German literature and film to a broader audience. This volume contextualizes the broad-ranging topics and authors in terms of the Anthropocene, beginning with Goethe and the Romantics and extending into twenty-first-century literature and film. Addressing the growing need for environmental awareness in an international humanities curriculum, this book complements ecocritical analyses emerging from North American and British studies with a specifically German Studies perspective, opening the door to a transnational understanding of how the environment plays an integral role in cultural, political, and economic issues. 410 0$aLiteratures, Cultures, and the Environment,$x2946-3165 606 $aEuropean literature 606 $aMotion pictures$xHistory 606 $aMotion pictures 606 $aTelevision broadcasting 606 $aLiterature$xHistory and criticism 606 $aLiterature, Modern$y20th century 606 $aEuropean Literature 606 $aFilm and TV History 606 $aFilm and Television Studies 606 $aLiterary History 606 $aTwentieth-Century Literature 615 0$aEuropean literature. 615 0$aMotion pictures$xHistory. 615 0$aMotion pictures. 615 0$aTelevision broadcasting. 615 0$aLiterature$xHistory and criticism. 615 0$aLiterature, Modern 615 14$aEuropean Literature. 615 24$aFilm and TV History. 615 24$aFilm and Television Studies. 615 24$aLiterary History. 615 24$aTwentieth-Century Literature. 676 $a809.4 702 $aSchaumann$b Caroline$4edt$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt 702 $aSullivan$b Heather I$4edt$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910255359903321 996 $aGerman Ecocriticism in the Anthropocene$92497554 997 $aUNINA