LEADER 03004nam 2200589Ia 450 001 9910698115303321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a1-280-95761-1 010 $a9786610957613 010 $a0-387-36956-2 024 7 $a10.1007/978-0-387-36956-3 035 $a(CKB)1000000000283059 035 $a(EBL)302121 035 $a(OCoLC)232363259 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000147774 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11160831 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000147774 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10017037 035 $a(PQKB)11506335 035 $a(DE-He213)978-0-387-36956-3 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC302121 035 $a(PPN)123732476 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000283059 100 $a20070205d2006 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aEnhancing police integrity /$fCarl B. Klockars, Sanja Kutnjak Ivkovic, M.R. Haberfeld 210 $aDordrecht $cSpringer$d2006 215 $a1 online resource (296 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 08$aPrinted edition: 9780387369549 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aThe Idea of Police Integrity -- Measuring Police Integrity -- Profiles of Integrity -- The Charleston, South Carolina, Police Department -- The Charlotte-Mecklenburg, North Carolina, Police Department -- The St. Petersburg, Florida, Police Department -- The Second Survey -- Recruitment, Selection, and Training -- Processing Citizen Complaints -- Meting out the Discipline -- Circumscribing the Code of Silence -- Enhancing Police Integrity. 330 $aHow can we enhance police integrity? The authors surveyed over 3000 police officers from 30 U.S. police departments on how they would respond to typical scenarios where integrity is challenged. They studied three police agencies which scored highly on the integrity scale: Charlotte-Mecklenburg, North Carolina; Charleston, South Carolina; and St. Petersburg, Florida. The authors conclude that enhancing police integrity goes well beyond culling out "bad apple" police officers. Police administrators should focus on four aspects: organizational rulemaking; detecting, investigating and disciplining rule violations; circumscribing the informal "code of silence" that prohibits police from reporting the misconduct of their colleagues; and understanding the influence of public expectations and agency history. 606 $aPolice ethics$zUnited States 606 $aPolice corruption$zUnited States 615 0$aPolice ethics 615 0$aPolice corruption 676 $a363.2/2 700 $aKlockars$b Carl B$01178771 701 $aKutnjak Ivkovic$b Sanja$f1965-$0612021 701 $aHaberfeld$b M. R$g(Maria R.),$f1957-$01178772 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910698115303321 996 $aEnhancing police integrity$93124466 997 $aUNINA