LEADER 00491nam 2200157z- 450 001 9910698113703321 035 $a(CKB)2560000000121386 035 $a(EXLCZ)992560000000121386 100 $a20240129c2014uuuu -u- - 101 0 $aeng 200 10$aGetting Uncle Sam to enforce your civil rights 210 $cUnited States Commission on Civil Rights$aWashington, DC 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910698113703321 996 $aGetting Uncle Sam to enforce your civil rights$93425194 997 $aUNINA LEADER 06986oam 22004694a 450 001 9910956657803321 005 20251116225856.0 010 $a1-4962-1888-4 035 $a(CKB)4940000000148326 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5983221 035 $a(OCoLC)1129072096 035 $a(MdBmJHUP)muse74828 035 $a(BIP)73133646 035 $a(BIP)67545229 035 $a(EXLCZ)994940000000148326 100 $a19820119d2020 uy 0 101 0 $aspa 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aRelativization in Ojibwe /$fMichael D. Sullivan Sr 205 $a1st ed. 210 1$aLincoln, Nebraska :$cUniversity of Nebraska Press,$d[2020] 210 4$dİ2020 215 $a1 online resource (392 pages) 311 08$a1-4962-1479-X 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aCover -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Contents -- List of Illustrations and Tables -- Acknowledgments -- List of Abbreviations -- 1. A Basic Introduction to the Study -- 1.1. Purpose and Goals -- 1.2. Ojibwe Relative Clauses -- 1.2.1. What Is a Relative Clause? -- 1.2.2. Linguistic Preliminaries -- 1.2.3. Ojibwe RCs -- 1.2.3.1. Core versus Relative Root Arguments -- 1.2.4. Variation in SW Ojibwe -- 1.3. Algonquian Dialectology -- 1.3.1. Ojibwe Dialects -- 1.3.2. Implications of Classifications -- 1.3.3. Southwestern Ojibwe -- 1.3.4. Literature Review: Dialect Studies -- 1.3.4.1. Rhodes and Todd (1981) -- 1.3.4.2. Valentine (1994) -- 1.3.4.3. Nichols (2011, 2012) -- 1.4. Literature Review: Algonquian RCs -- 1.4.1. Rhodes (1996) -- 1.4.2. Johns (1982) -- 1.4.3. Johansson (2011) -- 1.4.4. Johansson (2013) -- 1.4.5. Lochbihler and Mathieu (2013) -- 1.5. Theoretical Preliminaries -- 1.5.1. Nonconfigurationality -- 1.5.1.1. The Pronominal Argument Hypothesis (PAH) -- 1.5.2. The Mirror Principle and the Minimalist Program -- 1.5.2.1. Feature Checking -- 1.5.2.2. Independent versus Conjunct -- 1.5.3. Split-CP Hypothesis (Rizzi 1997) -- 1.6. Conclusion -- 1.6.1. Concluding Remarks -- 2. Ojibwe Morphosyntax -- 2.1. Typological Preliminaries -- 2.2. The Sound System -- 2.2.1. The Vowels -- 2.2.2. Consonant Inventory -- 2.3. Morphology -- 2.3.1. Nouns -- 2.3.2. Pronouns -- 2.3.3. Verbal Morphology -- 2.3.3.1. Palatalization -- 2.3.3.2. Nominalization -- 2.3.4. Preverbs -- 2.4. Inflectional Sub systems -- 2.4.1. Modes -- 2.5. Topicality Hierarchy -- 2.5.1. Obviation -- 2.6. Initial Change -- 2.6.1. Wh-questions -- 2.6.2. Participles -- 2.6.3. Past/Completive -- 2.7. Word Order and Clause Structure -- 2.7.1. The Noun Phrase -- 2.7.2. Basic Constituency Order -- 2.7.3. The Left Periphery -- 2.7.3.1. Focus -- 2.7.3.2. Topic -- 3. Methodology. 327 $a3.1. Survey Apparatus -- 3.2. Archival Data -- 3.3. Findings -- 3.3.1. ji-/da- Complementizer, jibwaa/dabwaa -- 3.3.2. Preterit Peripheral Suffixes -- 3.3.3. Neutralization of Inanimate Plural in Conjunct -- 3.3.4. Number under Obviation -- 3.3.5. Restructuring of Dependent Stems -- 3.3.6. Core Demonstratives -- 3.3.7. Phonological Variation -- 3.3.7.1. Nasal Behavior -- 3.3.7.1.1. Initial /n/ -- 3.3.7.1.2. Final Nasal in Negation Suffix -sii(n) -- 3.3.7.1.3. Final Nasal /n/ Behavior -- 3.3.7.1.4. Nasal Spreading -- 3.3.7.2. Initial /g/ -- 3.3.7.3. Vowel and Glide Quality -- 3.3.7.3.1. Labialization and Rounding -- 3.3.7.3.2. Vowel Height /i/ versus /a/ -- 3.3.7.3.3. Articulation of Glides /y/ and /w/ -- 3.3.7.4. Other Points of Variation -- 3.3.7.4.1. Women's Names -k(we) -- 3.3.7.4.2. /t/ Epenthesis -- 3.3.7.4.3. Syncope -- 3.3.8. Lexical Variation -- 3.3.8.1. Body-Part-Incorporating Suffix -e -- 3.3.8.2. -ngwaam(i) Verbs -- 3.3.8.3. -aadage/-aadagaa Verbs -- 3.3.9. Animacy Status -- 3.3.10. TA -aw Stem Contraction -- 3.3.11. Initial Vowel Change -- 3.3.12. Iterative Suffix -- 3.3.13. Participles -- 3.3.13.1. Southern Strategies -- 3.3.13.2. Innovations -- 3.3.13.3. gaa- Participles -- 3.4. Discussion -- 3.4.1. Geographic Variation -- 3.4.1.1. Leech Lake as a Transitional Area -- 3.4.1.2. Intelligibility -- 3.4.2. Age-Graded Variation -- 3.4.3. Free Variation -- 4. Relativization in Ojibwe -- 4.1. Ojibwe Relative Clauses -- 4.1.1. Findings: Core Argument versus Relative Root Arguments -- 4.1.2. Variation in Relativization Strategies -- 4.2. Theoretical Framework -- 4.2.1. Plain Conjunct Morphosyntax -- 4.2.1.1. Brittain (2001) -- 4.2.2. Split-CP Hypothesis (Rizzi 1997) -- 4.2.2.1. FinP as Host to Conjunct -- 4.2.2.2. FocP Host to IC -- 4.2.2.3. ForceP and RCs -- 4.2.3. Cyclicity and Phases (Bruening 2001) -- 4.3. Refining the Analysis. 327 $a4.3.1. Feature Bundles -- 4.3.2. The Structure of the Ojibwe CP -- 4.3.3. Internally versus Externally Headed RCs -- 4.3.4. Concluding Remarks -- 5. Conclusions -- 5.1. Review -- 5.1.1. Implications of the Findings -- 5.2. Limitations -- 5.2.1. Obsolescence -- 5.2.2. Access -- 5.2.3. L2 Interference -- 5.3. Comparisons within the Algonquian Family -- 5.3.1. IC -- 5.3.2. Algonquian Participles -- 5.3.2.1. PA Participles -- 5.4. Directions for Future Research -- Appendix: VTA Paradigms -- Notes -- References -- Index. 330 $aIn Relativization in Ojibwe , Michael D. Sullivan Sr. compares varieties of the Ojibwe language and establishes subdialect groupings for Southwestern Ojibwe, often referred to as Chippewa , of the Algonquian family. Drawing from a vast corpus of both primary and archived sources, he presents an overview of two strategies of relative clause formation and shows that relativization appears to be an exemplary parameter for grouping Ojibwe dialect and subdialect relationships. Specifically, Sullivan targets the morphological composition of participial verbs in Algonquian parlance and categorizes the variation of their form across a number of communities. In addition to the discussion of participles and their role in relative clauses, he presents original research linking geographical distribution of participles, most likely a result of historic movements of the Ojibwe people to their present location in the northern midwestern region of North America. Following previous dialect studies concerned primarily with varieties of Ojibwe spoken in Canada, Relativization in Ojibwe presents the first study of dialect variation for varieties spoken in the United States and along the border region of Ontario and Minnesota. Starting with a classic Algonquian linguistic tradition, Sullivan then recasts the data in a modern theoretical framework, using previous theories for Algonquian languages and familiar approaches such as feature checking and the split-CP hypothesis. 606 $aOjibwa language 615 0$aOjibwa language. 676 $a497.333 700 $aSullivan$b Michael D$030417 801 0$bMdBmJHUP 801 1$bMdBmJHUP 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910956657803321 996 $aRelativization in Ojibwe$94475721 997 $aUNINA