LEADER 02273oam 2200481 a 450 001 9910696400103321 005 20071217073826.0 035 $a(CKB)5470000002376825 035 $a(OCoLC)181369563 035 $a(EXLCZ)995470000002376825 100 $a20071116d2007 ua 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurmn||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aUranium enrichment$b[electronic resource] $eextension of Decontamination and Decommissioning Fund may be needed to cover projected cleanup costs : testimony before the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, U.S. Senate /$fstatement of Robin M. Nazzaro 210 1$a[Washington, D.C.] :$cU.S. Govt. Accountability Office,$d[2007] 215 $a10 pages $cdigital, PDF file 225 1 $aTestimony ;$vGAO-08-277 T 300 $aTitle from title screen (viewed on Nov. 16, 2007). 300 $a"For release ... November 15, 2007." 300 $aPaper version available from: U.S. Govt. Accountability Office, 441 G St., NW, Rm. LM, Washington, D.C. 20548. 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 330 $aThe report summarizes the extent to which the Uranium Enrichment Decontamination and Decommissioning Fund may be sufficient to cover authorized activities and the status of DOE's progress in developing decontamination and decommissioning plans for the Paducah and Portsmouth plants. 517 $aUranium enrichment 606 $aUranium enrichment$xBy-products$xWaste disposal$zKentucky$zPaducah 606 $aUranium enrichment$xBy-products$xWaste disposal$zOhio$zPortsmouth 606 $aRadioactive waste disposal$zUnited States$xCosts 615 0$aUranium enrichment$xBy-products$xWaste disposal 615 0$aUranium enrichment$xBy-products$xWaste disposal 615 0$aRadioactive waste disposal$xCosts. 700 $aNazzaro$b Robin M$01380853 712 02$aUnited States.$bCongress.$bSenate.$bCommittee on Energy and Natural Resources. 712 02$aUnited States.$bGovernment Accountability Office. 801 0$bEJB 801 1$bEJB 801 2$bEJB 801 2$bGPO 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910696400103321 996 $aUranium enrichment$93544181 997 $aUNINA LEADER 04471nam 22006135 450 001 9910337915303321 005 20200702063148.0 010 $a3-030-04774-1 024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-030-04774-0 035 $a(CKB)4100000007592211 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5660335 035 $a(DE-He213)978-3-030-04774-0 035 $a(PPN)233802126 035 $a(EXLCZ)994100000007592211 100 $a20190131d2019 u| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aAltered Policy Landscapes $eFracking, Grazing, and the Bureau of Land Management /$fby Robert E. Forbis Jr 205 $a1st ed. 2019. 210 1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Springer,$d2019. 215 $a1 online resource (182 pages) 311 $a3-030-04773-3 327 $aChapter 1. Introduction -- Chapter 2. Legal history -- Chapter 3. Executive branch -- Chapter 4. Subgovernments -- Chapter 5. Governance -- Chapter 6. Energy development -- Chapter 7. Ranching -- Chapter 8. Conclusion. 330 $aThis book documents the United States Bureau of Land Management's (BLM) shift from a rancher-dominated agency to an energy-dominated agency. This shift is analyzed by identifying the conditions under which the expansion of hydraulic fracturing (fracking) in the Rocky Mountain West triggered a political conflict between ranching and energy stakeholder groups. Through scrutiny of federal actions and policies implemented by the Executive Branch between 2004 and 2010, the book sheds light on the emphasis of domestic energy production during this time period, and how the traditional ranching and energy alliance was split by shifting policy interests. The book is meant for policy makers, natural resource agencies, and students and researchers engaged in political science, public administration, and natural resource management. Chapter 1 introduces readers to the case study at hand, and reviews literature on public land agencies and policies. Chapter 2 summarizes the legal history of public land management by the federal government, and the conditions that caused the BLM to favor energy development over ranching in the mid-2000's. Chapter 3 details the role of the Executive Branch (Bush-Cheney administration) in affecting the BLM's domestic energy policies and resource allocation, and chapter 4 analyzes the role of subgovernments in affecting the BLM's motivations too. Chapters 5, 6 and 7 contain first-hand accounts from government officials, state petroleum associations, and ranching supported interest groups to explore the concept of subgovernment stakeholder domination in policymaking, and analyze the similarities and differences between different policy-making elites. Chapter 8 concludes the text by summarizing subgovernment theory, mapping the behaviors of subgovernment actors, and discussing the implications for future political appointees in the direction of land-management agencies like the BLM. . 606 $aEnvironmental management 606 $aEnvironmental policy 606 $aHydrogeology 606 $aEnvironmental law 606 $aNatural resources 606 $aEnvironmental Management$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/U17009 606 $aEnvironmental Policy$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/X33040 606 $aHydrogeology$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/G19005 606 $aEnvironmental Law/Policy/Ecojustice$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/U16002 606 $aNatural Resource and Energy Economics$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/W48010 615 0$aEnvironmental management. 615 0$aEnvironmental policy. 615 0$aHydrogeology. 615 0$aEnvironmental law. 615 0$aNatural resources. 615 14$aEnvironmental Management. 615 24$aEnvironmental Policy. 615 24$aHydrogeology. 615 24$aEnvironmental Law/Policy/Ecojustice. 615 24$aNatural Resource and Energy Economics. 676 $a363.705 676 $a333.10973 700 $aForbis Jr$b Robert E$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$0929729 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910337915303321 996 $aAltered Policy Landscapes$92089782 997 $aUNINA