LEADER 01501nam  2200349Ia 450 
001 996384558703316
005 20210104171838.0
035   $a(CKB)4940000000075645
035   $a(EEBO)2240955643
035   $a(OCoLC)ocm12224630e
035   $a(OCoLC)12224630
035   $a(EXLCZ)994940000000075645
100   $a19850702d1680      uy             |
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurbn||||a|bb|
200 14$aThe great and weighty considerations relating to the Duke of York, or, successor of the crown$b[electronic resource] $eoffered to the King, and both Houses of Parliament considered : with an answer to a letter, from a gentleman of quality in the country to his friend, relating to the point of succession to the crown : whereunto is added a short historical collection touching the same
210   $aLondon $c[s.n.]$d1680
215   $a[2], 37, [1] p
300   $aAttributed to Thomas Hunt.
300   $aA reply to: True patriot's Great and weighty considerations relating to the D, or successor of the crown.
300   $aReproduction of original in the British Library.
330   $aeebo-0021
607   $aGreat Britain$xKings and rulers$xSuccession$vEarly works to 1800
700   $aHunt$b Thomas$f1627?-1688.$01003013
801  0$bEAA
801  1$bEAA
801  2$bm/c
801  2$bWaOLN
906   $aBOOK
912   $a996384558703316
996   $aThe great and weighty considerations relating to the Duke of York or successor of the Crown$92302601
997   $aUNISA

LEADER 02394oam  2200421 a 450 
001 9910695776503321
005 20070322142638.0
035   $a(CKB)5470000002372013
035   $a(OCoLC)71226541
035   $a(EXLCZ)995470000002372013
100   $a20060831d2006      ua             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurmn|---|||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aHomeland Security$b[electronic resource] $eguidance and standards are needed for measuring the effectiveness of agencies' facility protection efforts : report to the Chairman, Committee on Government Reform, House of Representatives /$fUnited States Government Accountability Office
210  1$a[Washington, D.C.] :$cU.S. Govt. Accountability Office,$d[2006]
215   $aiii, 68 pages $cdigital, PDF file
300   $aTitle from title screen (viewed on Feb. 28, 2007).
300   $a"May 2006."
300   $aPaper version available from: U.S. Government Accountability Office, 441 G St., NW, Rm. LM, Washington, D.C. 20548.
300   $a"GAO-06-612."
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references.
327   $aResults in brief -- Background -- Organizations outside of the U.S. Government use security performance measures to enhance decision making and help ensure accountability -- U.S. agencies have made some progress in developing and using performance measures for facility protection programs, but lack guidance and standards -- Conclusions -- Recommendations for executive action -- Agency comments and our evaluation -- append. I. Objectives, scope, and methodology -- append. II. Examples of performance measures used by selected organizations outside of the federal government -- append. III. Comments from the Department of Homeland Security -- append. IV. Comments from the Department of the Interior.
517   $aHomeland Security 
606   $aPublic buildings$xSecurity measures$zUnited States
606   $aTerrorism$xPrevention$xGovernment policy$zUnited States
615  0$aPublic buildings$xSecurity measures
615  0$aTerrorism$xPrevention$xGovernment policy
712 02$aUnited States.$bCongress.$bHouse.$bCommittee on Government Reform.
801  0$bOIQ
801  1$bOIQ
801  2$bGPO
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910695776503321
996   $aHomeland Security$91686681
997   $aUNINA