LEADER 02356oam 2200493 a 450 001 9910695463003321 005 20061128094219.0 035 $a(CKB)5470000002370129 035 $a(OCoLC)74337420 035 $a(EXLCZ)995470000002370129 100 $a20061025d2006 ua 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurmn|---||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 14$aThe cost of living and the geographic distribution of poverty$b[electronic resource] /$fDean Jolliffe 210 1$a[Washington, D.C.] :$cU.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Economic Research Service,$d[2006] 215 $aiv, 22 pages $cdigital, PDF file 225 1 $aEconomic research report ;$vno. 26 300 $aTitle from Web page (viewed on Oct. 25, 2006). 300 $a"September 2006." 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 16-18). 330 3 $aThe prevalence of poverty has been greater in nonmetro areas than in metro areas in every year since the 1960s when poverty rates were first officially recorded. Accordingly, Federal funds for social assistance programs and community development have favored nonmetro areas. This study suggests that adjusting poverty measures to account for cost-of-living differences between metro and nonmetro areas reverses that ranking. Once adjusted for cost-of-living differences using the Fair Market Rents index, metro poverty is greater than nonmetro poverty in terms of prevalence, depth, and severity over the entire 1991-2002 study period. 606 $aPoverty$zUnited States 606 $aCost and standard of living$zUnited States 606 $aUrban poor$zUnited States$xEconomic conditions 606 $aRural poor$zUnited States 606 $aPublic welfare$zUnited States 607 $aUnited States$xEconomic conditions 615 0$aPoverty 615 0$aCost and standard of living 615 0$aUrban poor$xEconomic conditions. 615 0$aRural poor 615 0$aPublic welfare 700 $aJolliffe$b Dean$f1963-$01242876 712 02$aUnited States.$bDepartment of Agriculture.$bEconomic Research Service. 801 0$bORE 801 1$bORE 801 2$bGPO 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910695463003321 996 $aThe cost of living and the geographic distribution of poverty$93435656 997 $aUNINA