LEADER 01752oam  2200421 a 450 
001 9910692167803321
005 20031209082549.0
035   $a(CKB)5470000002351755
035   $a(OCoLC)53706489
035 9 $aocm53706489
035   $a(OCoLC)995470000002351755
035   $a(EXLCZ)995470000002351755
100   $a20031125d2003      ua             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurmn||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aMilitary readiness$b[electronic resource] $eDOD needs a clear and defined process for setting aircraft availablity goals in the new security environment
210  1$a[Washington, D.C.] :$cU.S. General Accounting Office,$d[2003]
300   $aTitle from title screen (viewed on Nov. 20, 2003).
300   $a"April 2003."
300   $aPaper version available from: General Accounting Office, 441 G St., NW, Rm. LM, Washington, D.C. 20548.
300   $a"GAO-03-300."
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references.
330   $aExamines whether key Department of Defense (DOD) aircraft have been able to meet mission capable (MC) and full mission capable (FMC) goals in recent years, and DOD's process for setting aircraft availability goals.
517   $aMilitary readiness 
606   $aAirplanes, Military$zUnited States$xMaintenance and repair$xEvaluation
606   $aMilitary readiness$xEvaluation
607   $aUnited States$xArmed Forces$xOperational readiness
615  0$aAirplanes, Military$xMaintenance and repair$xEvaluation.
615  0$aMilitary readiness$xEvaluation.
801  0$bGPO
801  1$bGPO
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910692167803321
996   $aMilitary readiness$93424767
997   $aUNINA