LEADER 03425nam 2200649 450 001 9910688410803321 005 20220420180615.0 010 $a1-009-03699-8 010 $a1-009-03733-1 010 $a1-009-03703-X 035 $a(CKB)4100000012873074 035 $a(UkCbUP)CR9781009037037 035 $z(PPN)263757366 035 $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/90922 035 $a(PPN)263757110 035 $a(EXLCZ)994100000012873074 100 $a20210112d2022|||| uy| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aApocalypse without God $eapocalyptic thought, ideal politics, and the limits of Utopian hope /$fBen Jones$b[electronic resource] 210 $cCambridge University Press$d2022 210 1$aCambridge :$cCambridge University Press,$d2022. 215 $a1 online resource (xiii, 225 pages) $cdigital, PDF file(s) 225 1 $aSocial Sciences 300 $aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 07 Apr 2022). 311 $a1-316-51705-5 327 $aThe hazards of studying secular apocalyptic thought -- The paradox of secular apocalyptic thought -- Apocalyptic hope's appeal : Machiavelli and Savonarola -- Tempering apocalyptic ideals : Hobbes and pretenders to God's Kingdom -- Reimagining God's Kingdom : Engels and M?untzer -- Ideal theory as faith -- Limiting the dangers of Utopian hope. 330 $aApocalypse, it seems, is everywhere. Preachers with vast followings proclaim the world's end. Apocalyptic fears grip even the nonreligious amid climate change, pandemics, and threats of nuclear war. As these ideas pervade popular discourse, grasping their logic remains elusive. Ben Jones argues that we can gain insight into apocalyptic thought through secular thinkers. He starts with a puzzle: Why would secular thinkers draw on Christian apocalyptic beliefs - often dismissed as bizarre - to interpret politics? The apocalyptic tradition proves appealing in part because it theorizes a relation between crisis and utopia. Apocalyptic thought points to crisis as the vehicle to bring the previously impossible within reach, offering resources for navigating challenges in ideal theory, which involves imagining the best, most just society. By examining apocalyptic thought's appeal and risks, this study arrives at new insights on the limits of utopian hope. This title is available as open access on Cambridge Core. 606 $aEnd of the world 606 $aEnd of the world$xPolitical aspects 606 $aUtopias 606 $aSecularization (Theology) 606 $aPolitical science$xPhilosophy 606 $aPhilosophy and religion 606 $aReligion and politics 610 $apolitical science 610 $aphilosophy 610 $areligion 615 0$aEnd of the world. 615 0$aEnd of the world$xPolitical aspects. 615 0$aUtopias. 615 0$aSecularization (Theology) 615 0$aPolitical science$xPhilosophy. 615 0$aPhilosophy and religion. 615 0$aReligion and politics. 676 $a321/.07 686 $aPOL010000$2bisacsh 700 $aJones$b Ben$f1985-$01352599 801 0$bUkCbUP 801 1$bUkCbUP 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910688410803321 996 $aApocalypse without God$93186430 997 $aUNINA