LEADER 03851nam  22006495  450 
001 9910672439503321
005 20251008131339.0
010   $a9783031227431$b(electronic bk.)
010   $z9783031227424
024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-031-22743-1
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC7204041
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL7204041
035   $a(CKB)26161994200041
035   $a(DE-He213)978-3-031-22743-1
035   $a(EXLCZ)9926161994200041
100   $a20230214d2023      u|         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurcnu||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aRelational Liberalism $eDemocratic Co-Authorship in a Pluralistic World /$fby Federica Liveriero
205   $a1st ed. 2023.
210  1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Springer,$d2023.
215   $a1 online resource (301 pages)
225 1 $aPhilosophy and Politics - Critical Explorations,$x2352-8389 ;$v24
311 08$aPrint version: Liveriero, Federica Relational Liberalism Cham : Springer International Publishing AG,c2023 9783031227424 
327   $aIntroduction -- Political Legitimacy Under Epistemic Constraints -- An Epistemic Reading of the Ideal of Co-Authorship -- Justification Under Nonideal Circumstances: Reflective Agreement and Relational Liberalism -- The Ideal of Public Justification Revisited -- Compromises for a Pluralistic World -- A Case Study: Extending Marriage Rights to Same-Sex Couples -- Conclusion.
330   $aThis book investigates the unresolved issue of democratic legitimacy in contexts of pervasive disagreement and contributes to this debate by defending a relational version of political liberalism that rests on the ideal of co-authorship. According to this proposal, democratic legitimacy depends upon establishing appropriate interactions among citizens who ought to ascribe to one another the status of putative practical and epistemic authorities. To support this relational reading of political liberalism, the book proposes a revised account of the civic virtue of reasonableness along with an investigation of the epistemic-specific dimension of political equality. By engaging with political epistemology and social theory, this book explores ways to address inherent tensions within the liberal paradigm, using the following strategies of addressing these tensions: first, it defends a twofold model of legitimacy that distinguishes the goals, methodologies, and justificatory tasks of both ideal and nonideal phases of the two-level justificatory framework; second, it contends that democratic legitimacy requires an engaged and contextual critical appraisal of the injustices that characterize our daily social lives, illustrating how structural forms of injustice represent a profound betrayal of the liberal ideal of democratic legitimacy.
410  0$aPhilosophy and Politics - Critical Explorations,$x2352-8389 ;$v24
606   $aPolitical science$xPhilosophy
606   $aPolitical science
606   $aSocial sciences$xPhilosophy
606   $aLaw$xPhilosophy
606   $aPolitical Philosophy
606   $aPolitical Science
606   $aSocial Philosophy
606   $aPolitical Theory
606   $aPhilosophy of Law
615  0$aPolitical science$xPhilosophy.
615  0$aPolitical science.
615  0$aSocial sciences$xPhilosophy.
615  0$aLaw$xPhilosophy.
615 14$aPolitical Philosophy.
615 24$aPolitical Science.
615 24$aSocial Philosophy.
615 24$aPolitical Theory.
615 24$aPhilosophy of Law.
676   $a321.8
676   $a321.801
700   $aLiveriero$b Federica $01334087
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
912   $a9910672439503321
996   $aRelational Liberalism$93044716
997   $aUNINA