LEADER 01671nas 2200505-a 450 001 9910672192903321 005 20221206102305.0 035 $a(OCoLC)314851677 035 $a(CKB)1000000000760126 035 $a(CONSER)--2009230676 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000760126 100 $a20090313a199u9999 -a- a 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 00$aCode of federal regulations$hTitle 21$iFood and drugs 210 $aWashington, D.C. $cNational Archives and Records Administration 215 $avolumes $cdigital, PDF file 311 $a2150-0533 517 1 $aFood and drugs 531 $aCODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS - TITLE 21 606 $aFood law and legislation$zUnited States$vPeriodicals 606 $aDrugs$xLaw and legislation$zUnited States$vPeriodicals 606 $aLegislation, Food 606 $aLegislation, Drug 606 $aDrugs$xLaw and legislation$2fast$3(OCoLC)fst00898830 606 $aFood law and legislation$2fast$3(OCoLC)fst00930954 607 $aUnited States 607 $aUnited States$2fast 608 $aPeriodicals.$2fast 608 $aPeriodicals.$2lcgft 615 0$aFood law and legislation 615 0$aDrugs$xLaw and legislation 615 12$aLegislation, Food. 615 12$aLegislation, Drug. 615 7$aDrugs$xLaw and legislation. 615 7$aFood law and legislation. 676 $a344 712 02$aUnited States.$bOffice of the Federal Register. 906 $aJOURNAL 912 $a9910672192903321 996 $aCode of federal regulations$93042827 997 $aUNINA LEADER 04496nam 2200733 450 001 9910827863703321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a0-8014-7078-1 010 $a0-8014-7079-X 024 7 $a10.7591/9780801470790 035 $a(CKB)3710000000087752 035 $a(OCoLC)870273150 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebrary10836273 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001115720 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11629642 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001115720 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11083987 035 $a(PQKB)10737002 035 $a(StDuBDS)EDZ0001505819 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3138573 035 $a(MdBmJHUP)muse34651 035 $a(DE-B1597)478233 035 $a(OCoLC)979748012 035 $a(DE-B1597)9780801470790 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3138573 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10836273 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL683559 035 $a(OCoLC)922998456 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000087752 100 $a20130814d2014 uy| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aNew policies for new residents $eimmigrants, advocacy, and governance in Japan and beyond /$fDeborah J. Milly 210 1$aIthaca :$cCornell University Press,$d2014. 215 $a1 online resource (279 p.) 300 $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph 311 $a1-322-52277-4 311 $a0-8014-5222-8 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aIntroduction : governance and advocacy for immigrants -- Trajectories of the governance-advocacy linkage -- National policy advocacy in recent countries of immigration -- Policy change in Japan : the national view -- Japan's local governments and the emerging governance system -- Japan's nongovernmental advocacy : webs of national activism and local governance -- Governance across levels in recent countries of immigration -- Shocks to the system : the impact of economic and political crises -- Conclusion : advocacy toward inclusion?. 330 $aIn recent decades, many countries have experienced both a rapid increase of in-migration of foreign nationals and a large-scale devolution of governance to the local level. The result has been new government policies to promote the social inclusion of recently arrived residents. In New Policies for New Residents, Deborah J. Milly focuses on the intersection of these trends in Japan. Despite the country's history of restrictive immigration policies, some Japanese favor a more accepting approach to immigrants. Policies supportive of foreign residents could help attract immigrants as the country adjusts to labor market conditions and a looming demographic crisis. As well, local citizen engagement is producing more inclusive approaches to community. Milly compares the policy discussions and outcomes in Japan with those in South Korea and in two similarly challenged Mediterranean nations, Italy and Spain. All four are recent countries of immigration, and all undertook major policy innovations for immigrants by the 2000's. In Japan and Spain, local NGO-local government collaboration has influenced national policy through the advocacy of local governments. South Korea and Italy included NGO advocates as policy actors and partners at the national level far earlier as they responded to new immigration, producing policy changes that fueled local networks of governance and advocacy. In all these cases, Milly finds, nongovernmental advocacy groups have the power to shape local governance and affect national policy, though in different ways. 606 $aImmigrants$xGovernment policy$zJapan 606 $aDecentralization in government$zJapan 606 $aImmigrants$xGovernment policy$vCross-cultural studies 606 $aEmigration and immigration$xGovernment policy$vCross-cultural studies 606 $aDecentralization in government$vCross-cultural studies 607 $aJapan$xEmigration and immigration 615 0$aImmigrants$xGovernment policy 615 0$aDecentralization in government 615 0$aImmigrants$xGovernment policy 615 0$aEmigration and immigration$xGovernment policy 615 0$aDecentralization in government 676 $a325.52 700 $aMilly$b Deborah J.$f1952-$01599662 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910827863703321 996 $aNew policies for new residents$93922421 997 $aUNINA