LEADER 03966nam 22006615 450 001 9910659495603321 005 20230915132239.0 010 $a3-031-13001-4 024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-031-13001-4 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC7203890 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL7203890 035 $a(CKB)26162277000041 035 $a(DE-He213)978-3-031-13001-4 035 $a(PPN)268208816 035 $a(EXLCZ)9926162277000041 100 $a20230210d2023 u| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aFairness in Criminal Appeal $eA Critical and Interdisciplinary Analysis of the ECtHR Case-Law /$fedited by Helena Morão, Ricardo Tavares da Silva 205 $a1st ed. 2023. 210 1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Springer,$d2023. 215 $a1 online resource (214 pages) 311 08$aPrint version: Morão, Helena Fairness in Criminal Appeal Cham : Springer International Publishing AG,c2023 9783031130007 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 327 $aPart I: Introduction -- The ECtHR case-law on immediacy in criminal appeal -- Part II: Criminal appeal immediacy models and the ECtHR case-law -- The evidence renewal model in Italy -- The retrial model in Spain -- The audio recordings model in Portugal: The appeal court?s perspective -- The audio recordings model in Portugal: The defendant?s and the victim?s perspectives -- Part III: Immediacy in criminal procedure theory and cognitive sciences -- Immediacy at the first instance trial -- Audio-visual recordings as evidence in criminal procedure -- Neuroscience of memory and philosophy of knowledge challenges to immediacy -- AI assistance in the courtroom and immediacy -- Part IV: Concluding thoughts -- On the legitimacy of the ECtHR?s criminal appeal immediacy requirement. 330 $aThis book addresses the European Court of Human Rights? fairness standards in criminal appeal, filling a gap in this less researched area of studies. Based on a fair trial immediacy requirement, the Court has found several violations of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights at the appellate level by at least eighteen States of the Council of Europe in a vast array of cases, particularly in contexts of first instance acquittals overturning and of sentences increasing on appeal. On the one hand, the book critically engages this case-law with the law revisions it has recently inspired in European countries, as well as with the critiques and difficulties that it continues to raise. On the other hand, it interweaves insight from criminal procedure theory with new discoveries in the field of cognitive sciences (neuroscience of memory, philosophy of knowledge, AI), shedding an interdisciplinary light on the (in)adequacy and limits of the Strasbourg Court?s jurisprudence. 606 $aHuman rights 606 $aCriminal law 606 $aConflict of laws 606 $aConflict of laws 606 $aInternational law 606 $aComparative law 606 $aHuman Rights 606 $aCriminal Law and Criminal Procedure Law 606 $aPrivate International Law, International and Foreign Law, Comparative Law 615 0$aHuman rights. 615 0$aCriminal law. 615 0$aConflict of laws. 615 0$aConflict of laws. 615 0$aInternational law. 615 0$aComparative law. 615 14$aHuman Rights. 615 24$aCriminal Law and Criminal Procedure Law. 615 24$aPrivate International Law, International and Foreign Law, Comparative Law. 676 $a929 676 $a345.4056 702 $aMora?o$b Helena 702 $aTavares da Silva$b Ricardo 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910659495603321 996 $aFairness in Criminal Appeal$93030824 997 $aUNINA