LEADER 00951nam0-22003131i-450-
001 990003764870403321
005 20130206144422.0
035   $a000376487
035   $aFED01000376487
035   $a(Aleph)000376487FED01
035   $a000376487
100   $a20030910d--------km-y0itay50------ba
101 1 $aita
102   $aIT
105   $ay-------001yy
200 1 $a<<I >>canti popolari russi$fVladimir Ja. Propp$gcon una scelta di canti a cura di Gigliola Venturi$gtraduzione di Gigliola Venturi
210   $aTorino$cEinaudi$d1976
215   $aXVI, 255 p.$d19 cm
225 1 $aReprints Einaudi$v83
610 0 $aCANZONI POPOLARI$aRussia$aStudi
676   $a398.870947
700  1$aPropp,$bVladimir Iakovlevich$f<1895-1970>$0213042
801  0$aIT$bUNINA$gRICA$2UNIMARC
901   $aBK
912   $a990003764870403321
952   $a398.870947 PRO 1$b60$fBFS
959   $aBFS
996   $aCanti popolari russi$9133471
997   $aUNINA

LEADER 02478nam  2200541   450 
001 9910648576203321
005 20231110214835.0
010   $a3-11-070816-7
024 7 $a10.1515/9783110708165
035   $a(CKB)4100000011789350
035   $a(DE-B1597)551691
035   $a(OCoLC)1243312263
035   $a(DE-B1597)9783110708165
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC6510043
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL6510043
035   $a(OCoLC)1241452326
035   $a(EXLCZ)994100000011789350
100   $a20211004d2021      uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|||||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aConcepts and the appeal to cognitive science /$fSamuel D. Taylor
210  1$aBerlin ;$aBoston :$cDu?sseldorf University Press,$d[2021]
210  4$dİ2021
215   $a1 online resource (XIII, 180 p.)
225 0 $aDissertations in Language and Cognition
311   $a3-11-070803-5 
327   $tFrontmatter -- $tAcknowledgements -- $tContents -- $tList of Figures -- $tList of Tables -- $t1 Introduction -- $t2 Standard View Theories of concept -- $t3 The Appeal to Cognitive Science -- $t4 Problem 1: Explanatory Ambiguity -- $t5 Problem 2: Explananda Ambiguity -- $t6 Concept as a Working Hypothesis -- $t7 Why Appeals to Cognitive Science Fail -- $t8 Appendix -- $tBibliography
330   $aThis book evaluates whether or not we can decide on the best theory of concepts by appealing to the explanatory results of cognitive science. It undertakes an in-depth analysis of different theories of concepts and of the explanations formulated in cognitive science. As a result, two reasons are provided for thinking that an appeal to cognitive science cannot help to decide on the best theory of concepts.
410  0$aDissertations in Language and Cognition 
606   $aCognitive science
610   $aCognitive Science.
610   $aCognitive Scientific Explanations.
610   $aConcepts.
610   $aMental Representations.
615  0$aCognitive science.
676   $a153
700   $aTaylor$b Samuel D.$01262472
712 02$aCRC 991: The Structure of Representations in Language, Cognition, and Science$4fnd$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/fnd
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910648576203321
996   $aConcepts and the appeal to cognitive science$92950980
997   $aUNINA