LEADER 02485nam 2200397Ia 450 001 996387533103316 005 20221108023645.0 035 $a(CKB)1000000000626941 035 $a(EEBO)2240902458 035 $a(OCoLC)15500985 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000626941 100 $a19870408d1682 uy | 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurbn||||a|bb| 200 00$aArgumentum anti-Normannicum, or, An argument proving, from ancient histories and records, that William, Duke of Normandy, made no absolute conquest of England by the sword, in the sense of our modern writers being an answer to these four questions ..$b[electronic resource] 210 $aLondon $cPrinted by John Darby$d1682 215 $a[10], clxiv p., [1] leaf of plates $cill 300 $a"This publication, occasioned by a work of William Pettyt's, entitled Antient rights of the commons of England, 1680, was answered by Brady in his Introduction to old English history. It is by some attributed to Atwood, and by others to Cooke or Johnson." cf. Lowndes. Has also been attributed to Petyt and to Sir Edward Coke. 300 $aIdentified on UMI microfilm and reel guide as variant of C4907 (number cancelled in Wing 2nd ed.). 300 $aReproduction of original in the Huntington Library. 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 327 $a(from t.p.) I. Whether William the First made an absolute conquest of this nation at his first entrance? -- II. Whether he cancelled and abolished all the Confessor's laws? -- III. Whether he divided all our estates and fortunes between himself and his nobles? -- IV. Whether it be not a grand error to affirm that there were no English-men in the common council of the whole kingdom? 330 $aeebo-0113 607 $aGreat Britain$xHistory$yWilliam I, 1066-1087 701 $aAtwood$b William$fd. 1705?$0793136 701 $aCoke$b Edward$cSir,$f1552-1634.$0626804 701 $aCooke$b Edward$cof the Middle Temple.$0793688 701 $aJohnson$b Samuel$f1649-1703.$01001074 701 $aPetyt$b William$f1636-1707.$01004013 801 0$bEAK 801 1$bEAK 801 2$bWaOLN 906 $aBOOK 912 $a996387533103316 996 $aArgumentum anti-Normannicum, or, An argument proving, from ancient histories and records, that William, Duke of Normandy, made no absolute conquest of England by the sword, in the sense of our modern writers being an answer to these four questions .$92417417 997 $aUNISA LEADER 03368nam 22005775 450 001 9910647386903321 005 20230218010142.0 010 $a9783662666838 010 $a3662666839 024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-662-66683-8 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC7187322 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL7187322 035 $a(CKB)26068929200041 035 $a(DE-He213)978-3-662-66683-8 035 $a(EXLCZ)9926068929200041 100 $a20230128d2023 u| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 14$aThe Book's Road in the Age of Digitization $eA Three-Dimensional Analysis /$fby Janina Krieger 205 $a1st ed. 2023. 210 1$aBerlin, Heidelberg :$cSpringer Berlin Heidelberg :$cImprint: Palgrave Macmillan,$d2023. 215 $a1 online resource (335 pages) 311 08$aPrint version: Krieger, Janina The Books' Road in the Age of Digitization Berlin, Heidelberg : Palgrave Macmillan US,c2023 9783662666821 327 $aThe problem and its background -- Approach & methods of analysis -- The study of readers: "life history is reading history" -- The literary perspective -- Media Theories Revisited -- Conclusion & outlook. . 330 $aAlthough every area of life is permeated by digital processes, the majority of Germans seem to resist digital alternatives when it comes to the activity of reading. The printed book continues to enjoy much greater popularity than the eBook. This seems surprising, since the entire communication behavior has moved to digital devices. So what lies behind this? Why are there still printed books in digital times? Previous studies of the printed book have focused primarily on its media future, as this seemed threatened by digitization. In this work, Janina Krieger instead examines the past from three perspectives in order to gain insights into the present. While other studies always chose one method, which mostly belonged to the quantitative approach, here three subjects are identified, which are examined with different methods and in their combination can provide an answer to the research question: the consumers of literature (the readers), literature itself (the selected genre is the novel), and the media theories of the 20th century, which have already dealt with media change. The author Janina Krieger holds a PhD in German Literature and Media Studies from the University of Mannheim. The translation was done with the help of artificial intelligence. A subsequent human revision was done primarily in terms of content. 606 $aLiterature 606 $aMass media and culture 606 $aLiterature and technology 606 $aMass media and literature 606 $aLiterature 606 $aMedia Culture 606 $aLiterature and Technology 615 0$aLiterature. 615 0$aMass media and culture. 615 0$aLiterature and technology. 615 0$aMass media and literature. 615 14$aLiterature. 615 24$aMedia Culture. 615 24$aLiterature and Technology. 676 $a070.5797 700 $aKrieger$b Janina$01277000 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910647386903321 996 $aThe Books' Road in the Age of Digitization$93009693 997 $aUNINA