LEADER 04265nam 2200481 450 001 9910640386403321 005 20230507164202.0 010 $a3-031-22158-3 024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-031-22158-3 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC7168725 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL7168725 035 $a(DE-He213)978-3-031-22158-3 035 $a(EXLCZ)9925945667700041 100 $a20230507d2023 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aBeyond 2% - NATO partners, institutions & burden management $econcepts, risks and models /$fAnessa L. Kimball 205 $a1st ed. 2023. 210 1$aCham, Switzerland :$cPalgrave Macmillan,$d[2023] 210 4$d©2023 215 $a1 online resource (259 pages) 225 1 $aCanada and International Affairs,$x2523-7195 311 08$aPrint version: Kimball, Anessa L. Beyond 2%--NATO Partners, Institutions and Burden Management Cham : Springer International Publishing AG,c2023 9783031221576 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aChapter 1: Introduction -- Chapter 2: Cooperation, sharing defense burdens, and defense institutions -- Chapter 3: Complexity and burden sharing: member risks and threats -- Chapter 4: ?Measuring? NATO member defense burdens?Beyond 2% -- Chapter 5: Theoretical perspectives on collective (defense & security) burden sharing -- Chapter 6: Risk management model of institutional burden sharing -- Chapter 7: Support for the Risk management model of institutional burdens -- Chapter 8: Contributions, future plans, implications, & conclusions. 330 $a This book advances North Atlantic Treaty Organization (henceforth, NATO) burden analysis through a decomposition of the political, financial, social, and defense burdens members take on for the institution. The overemphasis of committing a minimum of 2% of member state Gross Domestic Product (GDP) to defense spending, as a proxy indicator of alliance commitment does not properly reflect how commitments reduce risks should Article V be invoked through attack (i.e., 2% is a political & symbolic target adopted by Defense Ministers in 2006 at Riga). Considering defense burdens multi-dimensionally explains why some members overcontribute, as well as, why burden sharing negotiations cause friction among 30 diverse members with differing threats and risks. In creating a comprehensive institutional burden management model and focusing on risks to members, the book explores the weaknesses of major theories on the study and division of collective burdens and institutional assets. It argues that member risks and threats are essential to understanding how burdens are distributed across a set of overlapping institutions within NATO?s structure providing its central goods. The importance of the USA, as a defense underwriter for some, affects negotiations despite its absence from research empirically; new data permit testing the argument (Kavanaugh 2014). This book contributes conceptual innovation and theoretical analysis to advance student, researcher, and policymaker understanding of burden management, strategic bargaining, and defense cooperation. The contribution is a generalizable risk management model of IO burden sharing using NATO as the case for scientific study due to its prominence. Anessa L. Kimball is Director of the Center for International Security at the École supérieur D?études Internationales and Professor in the Department of Political Science at Université Laval, Québec City. Professor Kimball is also the Co-Director of Security for the Canadian Defence and Security Network, a SSHRC partnership network. 410 0$aCanada and International Affairs,$x2523-7195 606 $aInternational economic relations 606 $aGross domestic product 615 0$aInternational economic relations. 615 0$aGross domestic product. 676 $a337.05 700 $aKimball$b Anessa L.$01353343 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910640386403321 996 $aBeyond 2% - NATO partners, institutions & burden management$93363315 997 $aUNINA