LEADER 03821nam 2200697 450 001 9910465006003321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a1-317-11983-5 010 $a1-317-11982-7 010 $a1-4724-2260-0 035 $a(CKB)3710000000202257 035 $a(EBL)1746983 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001261998 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11732599 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001261998 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11211544 035 $a(PQKB)10058317 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1746983 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1746983 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10897217 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL922475 035 $a(OCoLC)884647611 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000202257 100 $a20140805h20142014 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aHuman rights and the body $ehidden in plain sight /$fAnnabelle Mooney 210 1$aSurrey, [England] ;$aBurlington, Vermont :$cAshgate,$d2014. 210 4$d©2014 215 $a1 online resource (235 p.) 225 1 $aLaw, Language and Communication 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a1-322-09529-9 311 $a1-4724-2259-7 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aCover; Contents; List of Tables; Acknowledgements; Introduction: We Were Promised Jet Packs; 1 Universals and Foundations; Universality of Human Rights; Culture and Human Rights; (Anti) Foundations; The Current System; The Origin of Human Rights; Humane Models; The Human; Conclusion; 2 The Blinded Body; Bodies of Data; The Fields; Breaching, Balancing and the Monster; Particular Human Rights; The Singular Human Right; Frames; Conclusion; 3 The Body; Real Bodies; The Absent Body; Searching for the Soul of the Body; Conclusion; 4 The Body, the Index and the Other; The Body and the World 327 $aBefore the Zero InstitutionThis is My Body ; The Body as Index; Is and Ought; Bodies in the World: Climate Theory; Homo Sacer; The Other; 5 The Living Body; Water as a Human Right; Plachimada: People and Property; Thirsty Corporations; Money and Sense; The Public Trust; Roman Law; Anticipatory Negligence; Trust and the Political Order; A Coda; 6 The Embodied Mind; The Body and the Mind; Metaphor; Thought, Feeling and Space; What is Universal?; Bad Biology; Step Outside; 7 The Linguistic Body; Natural Semantic Metalanguage; NSM and Human Rights; Dehumanisation; What Makes Us Inhuman? 327 $aRoot CausesConclusion; Conclusion: Three Rights and Three Frames; References; Index 330 $aThis study brings research in linguistics and the way in which the body is written upon to bear on discourse on human rights and the body. Drawing on legal concepts and aspects of the law of human rights, the study argues that the proper frames for human rights are firstly the human body, seen as an index reliant on the natural world, secondly the globe and finally, language. These three frames generate rights to food, water, sleep and shelter, environmental protection and a right against dehumanization. 410 0$aLaw, language and communication. 606 $aHuman rights$xLanguage 606 $aHuman body$xLaw and legislation$xLanguage 606 $aSociological jurisprudence 606 $aSociolinguistics 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aHuman rights$xLanguage. 615 0$aHuman body$xLaw and legislation$xLanguage. 615 0$aSociological jurisprudence. 615 0$aSociolinguistics. 676 $a342.08/5 700 $aMooney$b Annabelle$f1974-$0876673 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910465006003321 996 $aHuman rights and the body$91957548 997 $aUNINA LEADER 01320nam 2200457 450 001 9910734399803321 005 20230803212921.0 010 $a3-8452-5651-6 035 $a(CKB)3710000000372227 035 $a(EBL)1987444 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1987444 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000372227 100 $a20161102h20142014 uy 0 101 0 $ager 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $2rdacontent 182 $2rdamedia 183 $2rdacarrier 200 00$aJahrbuch zur Liberalismus-Forschung $e26. Jahrgang 2014 /$fherausgegeben von Eckart Conze, Joachim Scholtyseck und Erich Weede in Verbindung mit Jurgen Frolich und Ewald Grothe 210 1$aBaden-Baden, Germany :$cNomos,$d2014. 210 4$d©2014 215 $a1 online resource (429 p.) 300 $aIncludes index. 311 $a3-8487-1610-0 606 $aLiberalism$zGermany 606 $aLiberalism 607 $aGermany$xHistory 615 0$aLiberalism 615 0$aLiberalism. 676 $a320.5 676 $a320.510943 702 $aWeede$b Erich 702 $aScholtyseck$b Joachim 702 $aConze$b Eckart 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910734399803321 996 $aJahrbuch zur Liberalismus-Forschung$92582709 997 $aUNINA LEADER 06556nam 22008415 450 001 9910637708403321 005 20260211110208.0 010 $a3-031-15947-0 024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-031-15947-3 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC7166064 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL7166064 035 $a(CKB)25913959000041 035 $a(DE-He213)978-3-031-15947-3 035 $a(PPN)267815336 035 $a(EXLCZ)9925913959000041 100 $a20221221d2022 u| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aDeath Determination by Neurologic Criteria $eAreas of Consensus and Controversy /$fedited by Ariane Lewis, James L. Bernat 205 $a1st ed. 2022. 210 1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Springer,$d2022. 215 $a1 online resource (481 pages) 225 1 $aAdvances in Neuroethics,$x2522-5685 311 08$aPrint version: Lewis, Ariane Death Determination by Neurologic Criteria Cham : Springer International Publishing AG,c2023 9783031159466 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aIntroduction/History of Death Determination by Neurologic Criteria -- Part I: Philosophical/Conceptual -- Arguments Supporting Neurologic Criteria to Determine Death -- Arguments Rejecting Neurologic Criteria to Determine Death -- Arguments Supporting the Whole-Brain Criterion -- Arguments Supporting the Brain Stem Criterion -- Loss of Hypothalamic Function is Required to Determine Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Loss of Hypothalamic Function is not Required to Determine Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Part II: Medical -- Intra/International Variability in the Determination of Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Controversies in Determining Death by Neurological Criteria in Pediatric Patients -- Arguments in Favor of Requiring the Absence of Brain Circulation to Determine Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Arguments Opposing the Requirement to Demonstrate Absence of Blood Flow to Determine Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Reports of ?Recovery? from Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Observation Time Prior to Determination of Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Temperature Considerations in the Determination of Death by Neurologic Criteria -- How Many Evaluations are Required to Determine Death by Neurologic Criteria? -- Part III: Scientific -- Research Questions about Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Research on Patients Declared Dead by Neurologic Criteria -- The Impact of Restoring Postmortem Mammalian Brain Circulation and Cellular Functions on the Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Part IV: Legal -- The Content of Laws on Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Is Consent Required for Physicians? Determination of Death by Neurologic Criteria? -- Legal Response to Religious and Other Objections to Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Death by Neurologic Criteria is a Legal Fiction -- Legal Considerations on the Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria in the Pregnant Patient -- Part V: Religious -- Christian Perspectives on Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Islamic Perspectives on Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Jewish Perspectives on Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Part VI: Ethical/Social -- Public Views on Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Cultural Considerations in the Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria in Asia -- Cultural Considerations in the Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria in Africa -- The Argument for Personal Choice in Defining Death -- The distinction Between Death Declaration and Death Determination Using Neurologic -- Criteria -- Why Families Object to Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Arguments Favoring Continuation of Organ Support when Families Object to Declaration of Death by Neurologic Criteria -- Arguments Opposing Continuation of Organ Support when Families Object to Declaration of Death by Neurological Criteria. 330 $aThis book presents principal controversies over the determination of death by neurologic criteria (?brain death?). The editors and authors are exceedingly well-versed in this subject and are on the forefront of the current debates. The content is divided in the following disciplinary: philosophical (conceptual), medical, scientific, legal, religious, and ethical/social. Many of the topics feature pro-con debates, allowing readers to consider the merits of the arguments and decide their own position. The work is targeted to clinicians and nurses who treat critically ill and dying patients, organ donation personnel, ethicists and philosophers who write on end-of-life issues, and lawyers and legislative/public policy professionals who draft laws on death determination. It identifies and debates the essential controversies currently raging in academic and public policy circles over the medical adequacy, scientific validity, and conceptual coherence of death determination by neurologic criteria. Whether a professional or a student, the reader will be given a comprehensive course in the most pressing controversies and areas of consensus in the determination of death by neurologic criteria. 410 0$aAdvances in Neuroethics,$x2522-5685 606 $aNeurology 606 $aNervous system$xSurgery 606 $aMedical care 606 $aNursing ethics 606 $aPhilosophy 606 $aSociology 606 $aNeurology 606 $aNeurosurgery 606 $aHealth Care 606 $aNursing Ethics 606 $aPhilosophy 606 $aSociology 606 $aMort cerebral$2thub 606 $aNeurociències$2thub 606 $aAspectes morals$2thub 608 $aLlibres electrònics$2thub 615 0$aNeurology. 615 0$aNervous system$xSurgery. 615 0$aMedical care. 615 0$aNursing ethics. 615 0$aPhilosophy. 615 0$aSociology. 615 14$aNeurology. 615 24$aNeurosurgery. 615 24$aHealth Care. 615 24$aNursing Ethics. 615 24$aPhilosophy. 615 24$aSociology. 615 7$aMort cerebral 615 7$aNeurociències 615 7$aAspectes morals 676 $a745.05 676 $a616.078 702 $aLewis$b Ariane 702 $aBernat$b James L. 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910637708403321 996 $aDeath Determination by Neurologic Criteria$93003012 997 $aUNINA