LEADER 03692nam 22007095 450 001 9910629300203321 005 20251008145240.0 010 $a981-19-7822-0 024 7 $a10.1007/978-981-19-7822-7 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC7136998 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL7136998 035 $a(CKB)25314892900041 035 $a(PPN)266356974 035 $a(DE-He213)978-981-19-7822-7 035 $a(OCoLC)1492958576 035 $a(EXLCZ)9925314892900041 100 $a20221113d2023 u| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aJudicial Transparency in China $eTheory and Realization Path /$fby Yiming Wang, He Tian 205 $a1st ed. 2023. 210 1$aSingapore :$cSpringer Nature Singapore :$cImprint: Springer,$d2023. 215 $a1 online resource (359 pages) 225 1 $aLaw and Criminology Series 311 08$aPrint version: Wang, Yiming Judicial Transparency in China Singapore : Springer,c2022 9789811978210 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aJustice: From Mystery to Openness -- Development of Contemporary China?s Judicial Openness System -- The Rationale Behind Judicial Transparency -- Methodologies for Researching Judicial Transparency -- The Overall Situation of China?s Judicial Transparency -- Status Quo of Judicial Transparency in Various Fields -- Promoting More Transparent Justice. 330 $aBased on the Judicial Transparency Index Assessment (2019 and 2020) conducted in China by the Institute of Law of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, this book summarizes and analyzes the current situation of judicial openness in China, using a sample of 218 courts across the country for the study. The book analyzes the ideological and institutional origins of judicial openness and examines the operation of judicial openness through the practical experience of role replacement. By analyzing evaluation data in the fields of audit information disclosure, trial information disclosure, judicial enforcement data disclosure, and judicial reform data disclosure, the book points out that the current judicial disclosure has made significant progress, but there are still problems such as unclear disclosure standards, insufficient rigidity in disclosure requirements, and the scope of disclosure still needs to be expanded. The book recommends accelerating the disclosure of judicial legislation, public standards, and strengthening assessment and accountability. 410 0$aLaw and Criminology Series 606 $aConflict of laws 606 $aConflict of laws 606 $aInternational law 606 $aComparative law 606 $aLaw$xPhilosophy 606 $aLaw$xHistory 606 $aPublic law 606 $aPrivate International Law, International and Foreign Law, Comparative Law 606 $aTheories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History 606 $aPublic Law 615 0$aConflict of laws. 615 0$aConflict of laws. 615 0$aInternational law. 615 0$aComparative law. 615 0$aLaw$xPhilosophy. 615 0$aLaw$xHistory. 615 0$aPublic law. 615 14$aPrivate International Law, International and Foreign Law, Comparative Law. 615 24$aTheories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History. 615 24$aPublic Law. 676 $a174.3 700 $aWang$b Yiming$0273534 702 $aTian$b He 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910629300203321 996 $aJudicial transparency in China$93083293 997 $aUNINA