LEADER 04193nam 2200529 450 001 9910624359503321 005 20230203014318.0 010 $a0-19-194651-6 010 $a0-19-266895-1 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC7044656 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL7044656 035 $a(CKB)24242965600041 035 $a(UK-OxUP)9780191946516 035 $a(PPN)268194173 035 $a(EXLCZ)9924242965600041 100 $a20220728d2022 ||| | 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aCitizens, elites, and the legitimacy of global governance $fLisa Dellmuth,Jan Aart Scholte,Jonas Tallberg and Soetkin Verhaegen$b[electronic resource] 210 1$aOxford $cOxford University Press$d2022 215 $a1 online resource (254 pages) 225 0 $aOxford scholarship online 311 08$aPrint version: Dellmuth, Lisa Citizens, Elites, and the Legitimacy of Global Governance Oxford : Oxford University Press, Incorporated,c2022 9780192856241 327 $a1 Legitimacy in Global Governance -- 2 Researching Legitimacy Beliefs -- 3 Mapping Citizen Legitimacy Beliefs -- 4 Mapping Elite Legitimacy Beliefs -- 5 Mapping the Elite-Citizen Gap -- 6 Explaining Legitimacy Beliefs in Global Governance -- 7 Explaining Citizen Legitimacy Beliefs -- 8 Explaining Elite Legitimacy Beliefs -- 9 Explaining the Elite-Citizen Gap in Legitimacy Beliefs -- 10 Legitimacy and the Future of Global Governance 330 3 $aContemporary society has witnessed major growth in global governance, yet the legitimacy of global governance remains deeply in question. This book offers the first full comparative investigation of citizen and elite legitimacy beliefs toward global governance. Empirically, it provides a comprehensive analysis of public and elite opinion toward global governance, building on two uniquely coordinated surveys covering multiple countries and international organizations. Theoretically, it develops an individual-level approach, exploring how a person's characteristics in respect of socioeconomic status, political values, geographical identification, and domestic institutional trust shape legitimacy beliefs toward global governance. The book's central findings are threefold. First, there is a notable and general elite-citizen gap in legitimacy beliefs toward global governance. While elites on average hold moderately high levels of legitimacy toward international organizations, the general public is decidedly more skeptical. Second, individual-level differences in interests, values, identities, and trust dispositions provide significant drivers of citizen and elite legitimacy beliefs toward global governance, as well as the gap between the two groups. Most important on the whole are differences in the extent to which citizens and elites trust domestic political institutions, which shape how these groups assess the legitimacy of international organizations. Third, both patterns and sources of citizen and elite legitimacy beliefs vary across organizations and countries. These variations suggest that institutional and societal contexts condition attitudes toward global governance. The book's findings shed light on future opportunities and constraints in international cooperation, suggesting that current levels of legitimacy point neither to a general crisis of global governance nor to a general readiness for its expansion. 410 0$aOxford Academic 606 $aInternational organization$xPublic opinion 606 $aLegitimacy of governments 606 $aElite (Social sciences)$xAttitudes 615 0$aInternational organization$xPublic opinion 615 0$aLegitimacy of governments 615 0$aElite (Social sciences)$xAttitudes 676 $a337.1 700 $aDellmuth$b Lisa$01265622 702 $aDellmuth$b Lisa 702 $aScholte$b Jan Aart 702 $aTallberg$b Jonas 702 $aVerhaegen$b Soetkin 801 0$bUK-OxUP 801 1$bUK-OxUP 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910624359503321 996 $aCitizens, elites, and the legitimacy of global governance$92996986 997 $aUNINA