LEADER 02683nam 2200505 450 001 9910585957303321 005 20220506092424.0 010 $a1-108-98130-5 010 $a1-108-98288-3 010 $a1-108-97471-6 035 $a(CKB)4100000012874172 035 $a(UkCbUP)CR9781108974714 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC7014141 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL7014141 035 $a(OCoLC)1312325992 035 $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/90963 035 $a(EXLCZ)994100000012874172 100 $a20200810d2022|||| uy| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 14$aThe idea of progress in forensic authorship analysis /$fTim Grant$b[electronic resource] 210 $cCambridge University Press$d2022 210 1$aCambridge :$cCambridge University Press,$d2022. 215 $a1 online resource (74 pages) $cdigital, PDF file(s) 225 0 $aCambridge elements. Elements in forensic linguistics$x2634-7334 300 $aOpen Access. 300 $aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 07 Apr 2022). 311 $a1-108-97132-6 330 $aThis Element examines progress in research and practice in forensic authorship analysis. It describes the existing research base and examines what makes an authorship analysis more or less reliable. Further to this, the author describes the recent history of forensic science and the scientific revolution brought about by the invention of DNA evidence. They chart the rise of three major changes in forensic science - the recognition of contextual bias in analysts, the need for validation studies and shift in logic of providing identification evidence. This Element addresses the idea of progress in forensic authorship analysis in terms of these three issues with regard to new knowledge about the nature of authorship and methods in stylistics and stylometry. The author proposes that the focus needs to shift to validation of protocols for approaching case questions, rather than on validation of systems or general approaches. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core. 606 $aForensic linguistics 606 $aAuthorship$xTechnique 610 $aForensic Linguistics 615 0$aForensic linguistics. 615 0$aAuthorship$xTechnique. 676 $a363.25 700 $aGrant$b Tim$c(Professor of forensic linguistics),$01252867 801 0$bUkCbUP 801 1$bUkCbUP 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910585957303321 996 $aThe idea of progress in forensic authorship analysis$92904659 997 $aUNINA