LEADER 03492nam 22005653 450 001 9910580223603321 005 20250506080452.0 010 $a3-03928-315-4 035 $a(CKB)5580000000342261 035 $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/87557 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC31982632 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL31982632 035 $a(EXLCZ)995580000000342261 100 $a20250506d2020 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurmn|---annan 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aJudging Research 205 $a1st ed. 210 1$aBasel :$cMDPI AG,$d2020. 210 4$dİ2020. 215 $a1 electronic resource (64 p.) 225 1 $aThe MDPI Writing Prize Series 311 08$a3-03928-314-6 327 $aIntro -- The MDPI Writing Prize Series Volume 2 -- Contents -- List of Contributors -- About the Series Editor -- Preface to "Judging Research: How Should Research and Researchers Be Evaluated and Rewarded?" -- Incentives, Rewards, and Recognition - What Really Motivates a Researcher? -- How to Evaluate and Reward Science and Technology Researchers -- Scientific Metrics: How Useful Are They? -- Tangible and Non-Tangible Rewards- a Balancing Act -- Judging and Rewarding Research and Researchers: Beyond Bibliometrics -- Judging Research in the Doors of Irreproducibility Crisis Era -- Should the Quality of the Journal Determine the Quality of the Research? -- Judging Research: How Should Research and Researchers Be Evaluated and Rewarded? -- Open Science, Sustainability and Qualitative Assessment of Merit for an Objective Evaluation of Research -- Impact Factor ? Impact: Lessons Learned from Research Evaluation -- Moving Beyond Metrics -- Mathematics in Current Science and in Scientific Evaluation -- Achievement of the Paper and Its Honor for a Researcher -- Judging Research: Is There Even a Need of Evaluating the Research? -- Research Quality and How to Find It? -- Judging Research: How Should Research and Researchers Be Evaluated and Rewarded? -- Judging Research: How Should Research and Researchers Be Evaluated and Rewarded?. 330 $aThe 2019 MPDI Writing Prize invited early stage researchers who are not native English speakers to write on the subject of "how research should be evaluated and how researchers should be rewarded". Six prizes were awarded, however there were many more entries. This book collates many of those entries and contains inspiring, thought-provoking and original viewpoints of open science through the eyes of those conducting research on a daily basis. 410 4$aThe MDPI Writing Prize Series 517 $aJudging Research 606 $aSociety & culture: general$2bicssc 610 $aopen research; early career researchers; open science; open access; open data 615 7$aSociety & culture: general 700 $aRittman$b Martyn$01318459 701 $aNilsson$b Nils A$049584 701 $aZhang$b Qi$0383798 701 $aOgashawara$b Igor$01817434 701 $aSivapragasam$b Magaret$01817435 701 $aSharma$b Arvind$0562116 701 $aFlores-Guerrero$b José$01817436 701 $aYüksek$b Ahmet$01817437 701 $aBihorac$b Ajna$01817438 701 $aGualtierotti$b Roberta$01817439 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910580223603321 996 $aJudging Research$94375206 997 $aUNINA