LEADER 04200nam 2200625 450 001 9910809619403321 005 20210430215230.0 010 $a0-8122-9283-9 024 7 $a10.9783/9780812292831 035 $a(CKB)3710000000656970 035 $a(EBL)4540271 035 $a(OCoLC)948780928 035 $a(DE-B1597)469680 035 $a(DE-B1597)9780812292831 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL4540271 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr11222695 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL919452 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4540271 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000656970 100 $a20160628h20162016 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|nu---|u||u 181 $2rdacontent 182 $2rdamedia 183 $2rdacarrier 200 10$aEquality on trial $egender and rights in the modern American workplace /$fKatherine Turk 210 1$aPhiladelphia, Pennsylvania :$cUniversity of Pennsylvania Press,$d2016. 210 4$d©2016 215 $a1 online resource (297 p.) 225 1 $aPolitics and Culture in Modern America 300 $aIncludes index. 311 0 $a0-8122-4820-1 327 $tFront matter --$tContents --$tIntroduction: Notions of Sex Equality --$tChapter 1. Defining Sex Discrimination --$tChapter 2. Class and Class Action --$tChapter 3. Feminism and Workplace Fairness --$tChapter 4. Reevaluating Women?s Work --$tChapter 5. Sex Equality and the Service Sector --$tChapter 6. A Man?s World, but Only for Some --$tChapter 7. Opting Out or Buying In --$tConclusion. Illusions of Sex Equality --$tList of Abbreviations --$tNotes --$tIndex --$tAcknowledgments 330 $aIn 1964, as part of its landmark Civil Rights Act, Congress outlawed workplace discrimination on the basis of such personal attributes as sex, race, and religion. This provision, known as Title VII, laid a new legal foundation for women's rights at work. Though President Kennedy and other lawmakers expressed high hopes for Title VII, early attempts to enforce it were inconsistent. In the absence of a consensus definition of sex equality in the law or society, Title VII's practical meaning was far from certain. The first history to foreground Title VII's sex provision, Equality on Trial examines how the law's initial promise inspired a generation of Americans to dispatch expansive notions of sex equality. Imagining new solidarities and building a broad class politics, these workers and activists engaged Title VII to generate a pivotal battle over the terms of democracy and the role of the state in all labor relationships. But the law's ambiguity also allowed for narrow conceptions of sex equality to take hold. Conservatives found ways to bend Title VII's possible meanings to their benefit, discovering that a narrow definition of sex equality allowed businesses to comply with the law without transforming basic workplace structures or ceding power to workers. These contests to fix the meaning of sex equality ultimately laid the legal and cultural foundation for the neoliberal work regimes that enabled some women to break the glass ceiling as employers lowered the floor for everyone else. Synthesizing the histories of work, social movements, and civil rights in the postwar United States, Equality on Trial recovers the range of protagonists whose struggles forged the contemporary meanings of feminism, fairness, and labor rights. 410 0$aPolitics and culture in modern America. 606 $aSex discrimination in employment$xLaw and legislation$zUnited States 606 $aSex discrimination against women$xLaw and legislation$zUnited States 607 $aUnited States$2fast 610 $aAmerican History. 610 $aAmerican Studies. 610 $aGender Studies. 610 $aPolitical Science. 610 $aPublic Policy. 610 $aWomen's Studies. 615 0$aSex discrimination in employment$xLaw and legislation 615 0$aSex discrimination against women$xLaw and legislation 676 $a344.73014133 700 $aTurk$b Katherine$01715036 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910809619403321 996 $aEquality on trial$94109295 997 $aUNINA LEADER 02808nam 2200589z- 450 001 9910574872803321 005 20220613 024 7 $a10.35985/9789588920726 035 $a(CKB)5600000000470642 035 $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/84143 035 $a(oapen)doab84134 035 $a(EXLCZ)995600000000470642 100 $a20202206d2017 |y 0 101 0 $aspa 135 $aurmn|---annan 181 $2rdacontent 182 $2rdamedia 183 $2rdacarrier 200 00$aLa subjetividad en la construccio?n del discurso acade?mico$eensayo 210 $aColombia$cUniversidad Santiago de Cali$d2017 215 $a1 online resource (45-55 p.) 311 08$a958-8920-72-8 330 $aEste arti?culo establece contraste entre la ensen?anza tradicional de la escritura -de ensayos- en la universidad, que ha invisibilizado las experiencias de los estudiantes como insumo del discurso acade?mico, y una perspectiva pedago?gica ma?s humana, que valida "la vida como texto"11, en la que aplica estrategias manifiestas por los escritores en sus propios ensayos, "huellas subjetivas"12 en sus discursos, que se muestran como una "dida?ctica oculta". Di-chas huellas se rescatan para comprender y ensen?ar a los universitarios procesos de escritura, a partir de una lectura metacognitiva de sus historias y hallar sus temas y sus estilos. La propuesta se desarrolla desde las narrativas biogra?ficas "La investigacio?n biogra?fico-narrativa en educacio?n", planteadas por Antonio Boli?var y otros (2001). 606 $aTechnical writing$2bicssc 607 $aColombia$2fast 610 $aEnsen?anza 610 $aEscritura 610 $aPedagogi?a 610 $aPromocio?n de la escritura 610 $aPromocio?n de la lectura 615 7$aTechnical writing 676 $a372.4 700 $aQuintero Moncada$b Ásbel$4auth$01324228 702 $aRojas$b Silvia María$4auth 702 $aArboleda$b Julio Cesar$4auth 702 $aZamudio Tobar$b Gladys$4auth 702 $aGiraldo Ramírez$b Germán$4auth 702 $aTrejos$b Adiela$4auth 702 $aEsperanza Benavides$b Gladys$4auth 702 $aValdivieso$b Bernardo$4auth 702 $aMercedes Palacios$b Elba$4auth 702 $aSepúlveda Alzate$b John Hamilton$4auth 702 $aHerrera Echeverry$b Jaime$4auth 702 $aMuelas Hurtado$b Martha Isabel$4auth 702 $aZamudio Tobar$b Gladys$4edt 702 $aSalazar Ríos$b William$4edt 702 $aZamudio Tobar$b Gladys$4oth 702 $aSalazar Ríos$b William$4oth 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910574872803321 996 $aLa subjetividad en la construccio?n del discurso acade?mico$94424986 997 $aUNINA