LEADER 02314nam  22004213a 450 
001 9910573815203321
005 20220818194930.0
024 7 $a10.38107/027
035   $a(CKB)5710000000006361
035   $a(EXLCZ)995710000000006361
100   $a20220614d2022      |y|         |
101 0 $aeng
200 10$aSeeking convergence? $ea comparative analysis of the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union on seeking asylum /$fMaja ?ysienia
210  1$aZürich :$csui generis Verlag,$d2022.
215   $aonline resource
330 3 $aSince 2009 two courts have been shaping human rights of asylum seekers in Europe: the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) and the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). Side by side, the courts examined who is protected from refoulement, when and how asylum seekers can be detained and what remedies they should have access to. Did they seek convergence in their asylum case-law or paid no attention to each other?s jurisprudence? Did they establish a coherent standard of the asylum seekers? protection in Europe? Judicial dialogue between the ECtHR and CJEU in the area of asylum is at the heart of this study. The book offers also a comprehensive overview of the asylum case-law of the two courts and identifies the main convergences and divergences in their approach to protection against refoulement, immigration detention and effective remedies.
517 1 $aSeeking convergence?
606   $aasylum seeker$9eng$2EUROVOC
606   $aCourt of Justice of the European Union$9eng$2EUROVOC
606   $aEuropean Court of Human Rights$9eng$2EUROVOC
606   $acase-law (EU)$9eng$2EUROVOC
606   $acomparative law$9eng$2EUROVOC
606   $aremoval$9eng$2EUROVOC
606   $amigration control$9eng$2EUROVOC
606   $aillegal migration$9eng$2EUROVOC
615  7$aasylum seeker.
615  7$aCourt of Justice of the European Union.
615  7$aEuropean Court of Human Rights.
615  7$acase-law (EU)
615  7$acomparative law.
615  7$aremoval.
615  7$amigration control.
615  7$aillegal migration.
700   $a?ysienia$b Maja$01252609
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910573815203321
996   $aSeeking convergence$92903933
997   $aUNINA