LEADER 01854nam  2200313z- 450 
001 9910572190103321
005 20230221130708.0
035   $a(CKB)5860000000047127
035   $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/83531
035   $a(EXLCZ)995860000000047127
100   $a20202206d2012      |y             0
101 0 $aita
135   $aurmn|---annan
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aHomo oeconomicus. Paradigma, critiche, revisioni
210   $aFirenze$cFirenze University Press$d2012
215   $a1 electronic resource (194 p.)
225 1 $aStudi e saggi
311   $a88-6655-109-0 
330   $aPantaleoni and Pareto re-established economic theory on the basis of homo oeconomicus which, despite criticisms, went on to become a strangely popular concept, not only among economists, but even in common parlance, where it has assumed a confusing variety of meanings. With a view to setting things in order, this book distinguishes: the methodological hypotheses, which could possibly be corrected on the basis of new economic psychology; the weak anthropologies, retrievable as 'given abstractions' within typical contexts; and finally the extreme versions, that reduce human nature to absolute egoism. The author makes a radical criticism of the latter, drawing upon the extensive tools derived from psychology, philosophical anthropology and political philosophy, and thus succeeds in demonstrating their lack of empirical foundation, their conceptual inconsistency and their ideological dangerousness.
606   $aSocial & political philosophy$2bicssc
615  7$aSocial & political philosophy
700   $aCARUSO$b SERGIO$4auth$0263073
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910572190103321
996   $aHomo oeconomicus$91142432
997   $aUNINA