LEADER 02256nam 2200337z- 450 001 9910571778503321 005 20230221130510.0 035 $a(CKB)5860000000047166 035 $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/82763 035 $a(EXLCZ)995860000000047166 100 $a20202206d2013 |y 0 101 0 $aita 135 $aurmn|---annan 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aFilosofia e storiografia nel dibattito anglo-americano sulla svolta linguistica 210 $aFlorence$cFirenze University Press$d2013 215 $a1 electronic resource (228 p.) 225 1 $aPremio Tesi di Dottorato 311 $a88-927-3473-3 330 $aThis book proposes a critical examination of the main approaches of contemporary historiography, with the aim of bringing out their latent conceptual structures. Reinhart Koselleck wrote that «Historical knowledge always focuses on something more than what is found in the sources»: it is all about making its theories and values explicit, as they are also particular and historical facts themselves, which have clumsily been raised to universal principles. The author brings to light the pre-eminent forms of our relationship with the past through an analysis going from historiography to philosophy - from Pierre Nora, Carlo Ginzburg, Lynn Hunt to Hayden White, Jacques Derrida, Frank Ankersmit; from the New Cultural History and the histoire de la mémoire to the narrativism and to the philosophies of the historical sublime. Going beyond speculation, it is perhaps possible to aspire to a new alliance between historical and philosophical thought, to delimit a ?middle space? between the unstructured praxism of a historiography without philosophy to the excessive idealism of a philosophy without history. 606 $aHistory of Western philosophy$2bicssc 606 $aNon-Western philosophy$2bicssc 615 7$aHistory of Western philosophy 615 7$aNon-Western philosophy 700 $aBondě$b Davide$4auth$0917627 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910571778503321 996 $aFilosofia e storiografia nel dibattito anglo-americano sulla svolta linguistica$92057443 997 $aUNINA