LEADER 02126nam  2200361   450 
001 9910571755603321
005 20230516025802.0
035   $a(CKB)5860000000047590
035   $a(NjHacI)995860000000047590
035   $a(EXLCZ)995860000000047590
100   $a20230516d2019      uy             0
101 0 $aita
135   $aur|||||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aSistema previdenziale pubblico tra vincoli e scelte /$fGustavo De Santis
210  1$aFlorence :$cFirenze University Press,$d2019.
215   $a1 online resource (54 pages)
225 1 $aLectio Magistralis
311   $a88-927-3045-2 
330   $aSocial security systems are in crisis almost everywhere in the world, partly due to the bad management from the past, especially far back in time, and partly due to their intrinsic characteristics, which were not always well understood by those who designed them, and even less so by those who subsequently intervened to change them. However, removing the many layers that have gradually been added to the debate, it seems possible to focus on the few, truly relevant variables about the issue, to separate the political choices from the exogenous variables (the constraints), to bring out the consequences of the different possible choices in the long and short run, and thus to contribute to safeguarding one of the cornerstones the modern social state, even if it is downsized in the process. In doing so, it also seems appropriate to clarify the compromise point that is intended to be pursued between actuarial equity and redistribution, two unfortunately incompatible, but still very relevant goals, which have always (confusingly) been present in the debate on the social security systems.
410  0$aLectio Magistralis.
606   $aPensions
615  0$aPensions.
676   $a368.4
700   $aDe Santis$b Gustavo$0106064
801  0$bNjHacI
801  1$bNjHacl
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910571755603321
996   $aSistema previdenziale pubblico tra vincoli e scelte$93364327
997   $aUNINA