LEADER 02353nam 2200409 450 001 9910571717603321 005 20230513092307.0 024 7 $a10.36253/978-88-6655-097-6 035 $a(CKB)5860000000047023 035 $a(NjHacI)995860000000047023 035 $a(EXLCZ)995860000000047023 100 $a20230513d2011 uy 0 101 0 $aita 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 00$aFlessicurezza/Flexiseguridad $eContesti nazionali e locali a confronto in Italia e Spagna /$fa cura di Laura Leonardi 210 1$aFirenze, Italy :$cFirenze University Press,$d2011. 215 $a1 online resource (100 pages) 225 0 $aPluriverso - Quaderni della Biblioteca del Polo Universitario di Prato ;$v7 311 $a88-927-3654-X 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 330 $aThe strategy of flexicurity was adopted as a model by the European Union and proposed to all the Member States as a solution for addressing the challenges connected with the competitiveness and instability of the markets, with a view to enhancing employment levels and maintaining social cohesion. The various contributions in this book analyse the concept of flexicurity and its effective feasibility in different institutional contexts, in particular Italy and Spain and - at regional level - in Tuscany and Catalonia. The consequence of the variety of employment and social security models is that the meanings and manifestations of flexicurity are highly divergent, even in cases as analogous as Spain and Italy, since the different contexts generate significant differences. The overall analysis demonstrates that the forms of regulation and organisation of the social institutions, and their complementary nature, have a major impact on the relations between forms of flexibility and security, and do not always give rise to the virtuous process of flexicurity. 517 $aFlessicurezza/Flexiseguridad 606 $aLabor market$zItaly 606 $aSocial security$zSpain 615 0$aLabor market 615 0$aSocial security 676 $a331.120945 702 $aLeonardi$b Laura 801 0$bNjHacI 801 1$bNjHacl 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910571717603321 996 $aFlessicurezza$92255047 997 $aUNINA