LEADER 05061nam 2201201z- 450 001 9910566486803321 005 20231214132939.0 035 $a(CKB)5680000000037511 035 $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/81017 035 $a(EXLCZ)995680000000037511 100 $a20202205d2022 |y 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurmn|---annan 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aIntegrated Pest Management of Field Crops 210 $aBasel$cMDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute$d2022 215 $a1 electronic resource (206 p.) 311 $a3-0365-3761-9 311 $a3-0365-3762-7 330 $aConsumers in the EU and beyond are increasingly concerned about the impact of pesticides on the environment and human health. In the context of EU phytosanitary and environmental policies, the common EU challenge is to reduce dependence on chemicals, improve food quality and increase the potential for developing more bio-based production systems. Therefore, novel control methods and new strategies that reduce the current dependence on insecticides need to be developed, applied and disseminated among stakeholders. As a cornerstone of sustainable agriculture, integrated pest management (IPM) aims to improve farmers' practices to achieve higher profits while improving environmental quality. Implementing the principles of IPM in agricultural production requires new and up-to-date knowledge generated by science and accepted by farmers. In this Special Issue, we focus on recent advances and methods for IPM in field crops. It contains eight original research articles and two review articles dealing with different aspects of IPM in some of the major field crops: Potato, Maize, Soybean, Sugar Beet, Barley, Rice, Eggplant and Quinoa as well as farmer education issues on IPM. The studies published refer to all the basic principles of IPM and give examples of their implementation in different crops and cropping systems. Research on various aspects of the implementation of IPM in crop production is a continuous need. The research presented helps to provide a mosaic picture with examples of how crop-specific, site-specific and knowledge-intensive IPM practices should be considered and translated into workable practices. 606 $aResearch & information: general$2bicssc 606 $aBiology, life sciences$2bicssc 606 $aTechnology, engineering, agriculture$2bicssc 610 $aSpodoptera frugiperda 610 $afarmers' knowledge 610 $aperception 610 $apest management practices 610 $amaize yield losses 610 $adamage severity 610 $afall armyworm 610 $asugar beet 610 $adegradation 610 $aresidues 610 $aneonicotinoids 610 $aimidacloprid 610 $athiamethoxam 610 $amalt barley 610 $abarley net blotch 610 $abarley leaf scald 610 $anitrogen rate 610 $agenotype 610 $acrop residues 610 $abiodiversity 610 $abiopesticides 610 $aconventional insecticides 610 $acrop farming 610 $aecosystem health 610 $aenvironmental protection 610 $ainsect ecology 610 $anatural enemies 610 $apest control 610 $asustainable agriculture 610 $aquinoa 610 $aEurysacca melanocampta 610 $aMacrosiphum euphorbiae 610 $aLiriomyza huidobrensis 610 $aFrankliniella occidentalis 610 $aIPM 610 $aPeru 610 $aantibiosis 610 $aantixenosis 610 $atolerance 610 $aeggplant cultivars 610 $agreen peach aphid 610 $aalien pest 610 $aItaly 610 $aOryza sativa 610 $aphytosanitary measures 610 $arice root-knot nematode 610 $atrap crop technique 610 $aupland rice cultivation 610 $aclick beetle 610 $acrop damage 610 $aintegrated pest management 610 $arisk assessment 610 $apest monitoring 610 $abiocontrol 610 $alandscape feature 610 $ahabitat manipulation 610 $acompanion plant 610 $amutual fund 610 $asoybean 610 $apre-sowing soil activities 610 $asoil fauna 610 $aground beetles 610 $adominance 610 $afrequency 610 $aDiabrotica virgifera virgifera 610 $aBt toxins 610 $aresistance 610 $ageometric morphometrics 610 $aSNPs 615 7$aResearch & information: general 615 7$aBiology, life sciences 615 7$aTechnology, engineering, agriculture 700 $aBaz?ok$b Renata$4edt$01322437 702 $aBaz?ok$b Renata$4oth 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910566486803321 996 $aIntegrated Pest Management of Field Crops$93035002 997 $aUNINA